ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2014
Tumor characteristics and metastatic sites may predict bevacizumab efficacy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic Versus Local Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasis: What to Choose and When?Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2016Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers and a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there was an improvement in the time to disease progression (TTP) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy, according to tumor characteristics and metastatic sites. Tumor characteristics and tumor burden were considered to be predictive markers of the therapeutic efficacy of bevacizumab. The medical records of 705 patients with mCRC were retrospectively reviewed in three oncology centers between January, 2005 and September, 2012. A total of 101 patients completed their first-line bevacizumab-containing treatment. The median TTP was 6.93 months [interquartile range (IQR)=4.20-9.80 months] in patients treated with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and bevacizumab vs. 7.42 months (IQR=6.08-10.68 months) in those treated with oxaliplatin, 5-FU and bevacizumab (P=0.589). When we compared patients with pulmonary metastases (median TTP, 9.9000 months) or other metastatic patients without pulmonary metastasis (median TTP, 6.9000 months), we observed a statistically significant difference (P=0.046). However, when the efficacy of bevacizumab was compared in terms of other tumor characteristics (tumor grade, size and lymph node involvement) and metastatic sites, the differences were not significant (P>0.05). We concluded that bevacizumab may be effective in all subgroups of patients with mCRC. Furthermore, bevacizumab with combination chemotherapy may be superior to combination chemotherapy only as the first-line treatment of patients with mCRC and pulmonary metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.