Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24649274›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2013

Combined serum mesothelin and carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

Kazuya Fukuoka, Kozo Kuribayashi, Shusai Yamada, Kunihiro Tamura, Chiharu Tabata, Takashi Nakano

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuya FukuokaCancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501; ; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501;
Kozo KuribayashiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Murakami Memorial Hospital, Asahi University, Gifu, Gifu 500-8523, Japan.
Shusai YamadaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501;
Kunihiro TamuraDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501;
Chiharu TabataDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501;
Takashi NakanoCancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501; ; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501;
Hyogo Medical University · JPAsahi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a highly aggressive tumor associated with asbestos exposure. The identification of a marker specific for MM may be of considerable value for the early detection of this tumor and may be used in particular to screen groups with a history of asbestos exposure. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) levels as a diagnostic marker for MM and investigate whether its diagnostic value is enhanced by combination with other biomarkers. Serum SMRP levels were measured using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 96 patients with MM, 55 patients with lung cancer and 39 individuals with a history of asbestos exposure. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for performance evaluation. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to select marker combinations (MCs). Serum SMRP levels in patients with MM were significantly higher compared to those in the other groups (P<0.001). The sensitivity of SMRP levels in diagnosing MM was 56% and its specificity for MM vs. lung cancer and individuals with asbestos exposure was 87 and 92%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.83] for the differentiation between MM and lung cancer and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86) for the differentiation between MM and individuals with asbestos exposure. For the MC of presence of effusion, SMRP and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, the AUC for the differentiation between MM and lung cancer (0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.97) and the differentiation between MM and individuals with asbestos exposure (0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.0) was significantly higher compared to that for SMRP alone (P=0.0001 and 0.0058, respectively). While the specificity of this MC was comparable to SMRP alone, its sensitivity was ∼20% higher compared to that of SMRP alone. Therefore, combining SMRP and CEA improves the diagnostic performance of SMRP alone. A combination of serum biomarkers, including SMRP, may facilitate the non-invasive diagnosis of MM.

Indexed as

malignant mesotheliomamarker combinationsMesomark™mesothelinsoluble mesothelin-related peptide

Identifiers

PMID24649274
PMCPMC3915672
OpenAlexW2072655254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.