Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24649236›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2013

Cancer prevalence in the city of Naples: Contribution of the GP database analyses to the cancer registries network.

Claudia Pizzi, Grazia Arpino, Giuseppe Acampora, Nadia Aiello, Augusto DE Rosa, Immacolata Diaferia, Alessandro DI Nunzio, Giuseppe Fragna, Amedeo Franco, Maria Russo and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Claudia PizziConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Grazia ArpinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Giuseppe AcamporaConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Nadia AielloConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Augusto DE RosaConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Immacolata DiaferiaConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Alessandro DI NunzioConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Giuseppe FragnaConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Amedeo FrancoConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Maria RussoConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Fulvia SansoneConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Carmela ScarpatiConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Antonio SpinusoConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Giovanni ArpinoConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Amalia LuceDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology, Second University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Giuseppina TommasielliConsorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche - Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;
Michele CaragliaDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology, Second University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Sabino DE PlacidoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 'Federico II' University, 80131 Naples;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Italian cancer registries network has not been sufficiently developed in the Southern regions. General practitioners (GPs) are knowledgeable about the prevalence, incidence and mortality for different types of cancer in their patient populations. The aim of this pilot study was to verify the feasibility and reliability of the characterization of cancer populations using GP databases in order to evaluate the impact of cancer in the general population of Naples. The characteristics of the cases studied have been collected by interview or electronic health record and recorded on paper or magnetic supports, appropriately conforming to the current privacy law. Databases are centralized, stored and codified on electronic data-sheets and periodically elaborated by the 'Consorzio Nazionale delle Cooperative Mediche' and 'Federico II' University. The present study was initiated on September 15, 2004. The analysed geographical area included the suburbs of 'Stella' and 'San Carlo all'Arena', situated in the historical center of Naples and corresponding to Health Care District 29 of the local health service. The analysis included 16,927 men and women (age range, 6-97 years) from the outpatient offices of 12 GPs who agreed to participate in the study. Results showed that the analysed population represents 16.3% of the general population residing in the area under study. We identified 342 (2%) patients with cancer, 143 (0.8%) of whom were men and 199 (1.2%) women (M/F ratio of 0.7). Of the 342 patients, 10 (5 men and 5 women) had a double cancer; thus, a total of 352 malignancies was characterized. Cancer prevalence was 2,020/100,000 inhabitants. This estimate is lower compared to the national prevalence (2,683/100,000 inhabitants) but higher compared to that in other southern Italian areas. Results, stratified by International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-IX), based on factors including gender and age, demonstrated that breast cancer, urogenital tumours and colorectal cancer are the most frequently occurring types of cancer identified among the inhabitants of Naples. Cancer prevalence in the historical center of Naples is in concordance with national estimates and projections and National Cancer Registries may be easily and accurately supported by GP medical databases.

Indexed as

cancer prevalencegeneral practitionersNaplestumour registries

Identifiers

PMID24649236
PMCPMC3915682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.