Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24649216›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2013

The biology of uterine sarcomas: A review and update.

Hiroshi Kobayashi, Chiaki Uekuri, Juria Akasaka, Fuminori Ito, Aiko Shigemitsu, Natsuki Koike, Hiroshi Shigetomi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. CouldBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Current Treatment Options: Uterine Sarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Prognostic Factors for Uterine Sarcoma and Carcinosarcoma: Insights from a 10-Year Follow-Up Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Expressions of HELQ and RAD51C in endometrial stromal sarcoma and their clinical significance].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Chiaki UekuriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Juria AkasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Fuminori ItoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Aiko ShigemitsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Natsuki KoikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Hiroshi ShigetomiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine sarcoma is a rare neoplasm, accounting for only 5% of uterine malignancies. The pathogenesis of uterine sarcoma remains largely unknown, although recent basic science and pre-clinical animal models have provided a better understanding of tumor biology. The aim of this study was to review the clinical features, imaging characteristics, genetic aberrations and therapeutic approaches in uterine sarcoma. This study reviewed the English-language literature on clinical and basic studies on uterine sarcoma. The common variants of uterine sarcoma are carcinosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). Genetic profiling efforts have identified amplification, overexpression and mutation, while the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis driven by these genomic and genetic aberrations have yet to be fully elucidated yet. Recent genome-wide studies have also identified complex chromosomal rearrangements as oncogenic mechanisms. The cell cycle regulators, p16 and p53, are frequently over-expressed and appear to be involved in key modifications of sarcomagenesis. Molecular-targeted therapy has now been evaluated in clinical trials for certain subtypes. In conclusion, aberrations of cell cycle control would be a critical step in the development of uterine sarcoma. This review has provided new areas of study targeting molecular and genetic pathways.

Indexed as

carcinosarcomaendometrial stromal sarcomaleiomyosarcomatumor biologyuterine sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID24649216
PMCPMC3916197
OpenAlexW2070585239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.