ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2013
Follow-up analysis of a randomized phase III immunotherapeutic clinical trial on melanoma.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tag-7 Gene-Modified Tumor Cells-Based Vaccine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Cancer.The oncologist · 2020Trial
- Long-term outcomes of helper peptide vaccination for metastatic melanoma.Annals of surgery · 2015Trial
- Vaccines as treatment for melanoma: an update review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A systematic analysis on the clinical safety and efficacy of onco-virotherapy.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Article
- Vaccine Therapies for Cancer: Then and Now.Targeted oncology · 2021Review
- Therapeutic vaccination immunomodulation: forming the basis of all cancer immunotherapy.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2019Review
- Immunotherapy Plus Cryotherapy: Potential Augmented Abscopal Effect for Advanced Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Review
- PLX4032 Mediated Melanoma Associated Antigen Potentiation in Patient Derived Primary Melanoma Cells.Journal of Cancer · 2015Article
- Melanoma vaccines: mixed past, promising future.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Development of a melanoma-specific vaccine is of clinical necessity. Therefore, a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial was performed (June 1988-June 1991) to assess the clinical effectiveness of our vaccinia melanoma oncolysate (VMO) vaccine in stage III melanoma patients. Patient data were collected from 11 institutions, as well as from the Social Security Death Index and were analyzed from April through August 2008 for disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS). The median OS for patients who were administered the VMO vaccine was 7.71 years, compared to 7.95 years for patients administered the vaccinia virus vaccine (V) (p=0.70). The median DFI for the VMO group was six years, while the median DFI for the V group has not yet been reached. This analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in OS in females in both groups (VMO, 79%; V, 92%), as compared to males (VMO, 57%; V, 68%) (p=0.0473). This follow-up analysis demonstrated that females had a survival advantage over males, thus warranting further investigation. This significant observation may facilitate the recruitment of patients for future clinical trials, as well as determine which patients are more likely to benefit from receiving the VMO vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.