ArticleBiomedical reports2013
Gene expression profiling of sense and antisense transcripts in liver regeneration by microarray analysis.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the roles of non-coding RNAs in liver regeneration.Non-coding RNA research · 2024Review
- Hepatectomy-Induced Alterations in Hepatic Perfusion and Function - Toward Multi-Scale Computational Modeling for a Better Prediction of Post-hepatectomy Liver Function.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Circulating Extracellular RNA Markers of Liver Regeneration.PloS one · 2016Article
- Genome-wide analysis of human constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) transcriptome in wild-type and CAR-knockout HepaRG cells.Biochemical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Differential expression of natural antisense transcripts during liver development in embryonic mice.Biomedical reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver regeneration is a hyperplastic phenomenon induced by partial hepatectomy (PH) or hepatic damage. A large number of genes have been indicated to be involved in the process of liver regeneration. It was recently reported that natural antisense transcripts are involved in the regulation of gene expression. However, no antisense transcript expressions in liver regeneration have been reported thus far. Therefore, the present study aimed to comprehensively identify up- or downregulated sense and antisense transcripts in liver regeneration using PH mice and a sense/antisense custom-microarray. The results showed that 97 genes were upregulated and 7 genes were downregulated for sense transcripts, whereas 15 genes were upregulated and 2 genes were downregulated for antisense transcripts in regenerating livers as compared to normal livers (P<0.05 and fold change >2.0). Sense and antisense transcripts of the genes,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.