ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2014
Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status.
Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2017Pooled it
- The muslim patient and medical treatments based on porcine ingredients.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- The Role of Mesh Implants in Surgical Treatment of Parastomal Hernia.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh in loop-ileostomy reversal: a case-control study.Updates in surgery · 2020Article
- Acellular Dermal Matrices: Applications in Plastic Surgery.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2019Review
- Tenogenesis of Decellularized Porcine Achilles Tendon Matrix Reseeded with Human Tenocytes in the Nude Mice Xenograft Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Review
- Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016Article
- One year experience of swine dermal non-crosslinked collagen prostheses for abdominal wall repairs in elective and emergency surgery.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft-tissue reconstruction for a variety of surgical conditions, such as abdominal wall hernia or pelvic organ prolapse, remains a challenge. There are numerous meshes available that may be simply categorized as either synthetic or biologic. Within biologic meshes, porcine dermal meshes have come to dominate the market. This review examines the current evidence for their use and the limitations of knowledge. Although there is increasing evidence to support their safety, long-term follow-up studies that support their efficacy are lacking. Numerous clinical trials that remain ongoing may help elucidate their precise role in soft-tissue reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.