Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24648596›Full record

ReviewCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2012

Linezolid effects on bacterial toxin production and host immune response: review of the evidence.

Binh An Diep, Ozlem Equils, David B Huang, Ron Gladue

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Methicillin-resistantBMJ case reports · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tedizolid Phosphate: a Next-Generation Oxazolidinone.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Binh An DiepDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ozlem EquilsMedical Division, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
David B HuangMedical Division, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Ron GladuePfizer Global Biotherapeutic Technologies, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pfizer (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLinezolid is active against a broad range of gram-positive pathogens and has the potential to also affect production of bacterial toxins and host immune function.

objectiveTo assess the evidence for direct effects of linezolid on bacterial toxin synthesis and modulation of host immune responses.

methodsLiterature searches were performed of the PubMed and OVID databases. Reviews and non-English language articles were excluded. Articles with information on the effect of linezolid on bacterial toxin synthesis and immune responses were selected for further review, and data were summarized.

resultsSubstantial in vitro evidence supports effects of linezolid on bacterial toxin production; however, the strength of the evidence and the nature of the effects are mixed. In the case of Staphylococcus aureus, repeated observations support the inhibition of production of certain staphylococcal toxins (Panton-Valentine leukocidin, protein A, and α- and β-hemolysin) by linezolid, whereas only solitary reports indicate inhibition (toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, coagulase, autolysins, and enterotoxins A and B) or stimulation (phenol-soluble modulins) of toxin production by linezolid. In the case of Streptococcus pyogenes, there are solitary reports of linezolid inhibition (protein M, deoxyribonuclease, and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins A, B, and F) or stimulation (immunogenic secreted protein 2 and streptococcal inhibitor of complement-mediated lysis) of toxin production, whereas published evidence for effects on streptolysin O production is conflicting. In vitro data are limited, but suggest that linezolid might also have indirect effects on host cytokine expression through inhibition of bacterial production of toxins. In vivo data from preclinical animal studies and a single clinical study in humans are limited and equivocal insofar as a potential role for linezolid in modulating the host inflammatory response; this is due in part to the difficulty in isolating antimicrobial effects and toxin synthesis inhibitory effects of linezolid from any secondary effects on host inflammatory response.

conclusionsAvailable evidence supports the possibility that linezolid can inhibit, and in some cases stimulate, toxin production in clinically relevant pathogens. However, more research will be needed to determine the potential clinical relevance of those findings for linezolid.

Indexed as

bacterial toxinimmune modulationinflammationlinezolid

Identifiers

PMID24648596
PMCPMC3954010
OpenAlexW2006609942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.