Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24648288›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2014

Improving rural newspaper coverage of nutrition stories: an educational assessment of editors' attitudes and learning needs.

Faryle Nothwehr, Matthew Chrisman, Julie L Andsager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faryle NothwehrUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA faryle-nothwehr@uiowa.edu.
Matthew ChrismanTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Julie L AndsagerUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTHU48DP001902 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PARKER, EDITH A · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1-U48DP001902-01NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001902NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local newspapers are an important source of information for rural residents but often lack accurate or helpful nutrition-related information. To improve the quantity and quality of nutrition stories in rural, local newspapers, it is important to understand the perspective of editors. An online survey of 51 rural Midwest editors was conducted to assess attitudes toward writing nutrition stories, sources of information, perceived challenges, and interest in learning more about writing such stories. Of respondents, 49% were female, and 63% had at least a 4-year college degree. Through a mix of closed- and open-ended questions, the majority indicated positive attitudes toward nutrition stories, were confident in their abilities to write them, and expressed interest in learning more. Challenges cited include lack of print space, small staff, lack of specific requests from readers for nutrition stories, and the need to avoid offending local agricultural businesses. Results should be useful in planning an educational intervention for editors. Meanwhile, public health practitioners should provide concise press releases to their local newspapers about their activities. Also, greater expressions of appreciation from public health professionals and other readers may lead to higher prioritization of nutrition-related stories, and ultimately to an environment more supportive of healthy eating.

Indexed as

DietHealth BehaviorNutritional SciencesAdministrative PersonnelConsumer Health InformationDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleNewspapers as TopicRural HealthSelf Efficacymedianewspapersnutritionrural

Identifiers

PMID24648288
PMCPMC4251733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.