Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24647923›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Impaired flexibility in decision making in rats after administration of the pharmacological stressor yohimbine.

Andrea L Schwager, Andrew K Haack, Sharif A Taha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Rat Models in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Research: Strengths, Limitations, and Implications for Translational Studies.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea L SchwagerDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Andrew K Haack
Sharif A Taha
University of Utah · US

Funding

Opioid modulation of neural encoding of motivation and rewardR01MH094870 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KEEFE, KRISTEN A · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Predoctoral Interdepartmental Training Program in NeuroscienceT32NS076067 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KEEFE, KRISTEN A · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094870NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS076067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleStress-induced disruption of decision making has been hypothesized to contribute to drug-seeking behaviors and addiction. Noradrenergic signaling plays a central role in mediating stress responses. However, the effects of acute stress on decision making, and the role of noradrenergic signaling in regulating these effects, have not been well characterized.

objectiveTo characterize changes in decision making caused by acute pharmacological stress, the effects of yohimbine (an α2-adrenergic antagonist) were examined in a delay discounting task. Noradrenergic contributions to decision making were further characterized by examining the effects of propranolol (a β antagonist), prazosin (an α1 antagonist), and guanfacine (an α2 agonist).

methodsSprague-Dawley rats were administered drugs prior to performance on a delay discounting task, in which the delay preceding the large reward increased within each session (ascending delays). To dissociate drug-induced changes in delay sensitivity from behavioral inflexibility, drug effects were subsequently tested in a modified version of the discounting task, in which the delay preceding the large reward decreased within each session (descending delays).

resultsYohimbine increased choice of the large reward when tested with ascending delays but decreased choice of the same large reward when tested with descending delays, suggesting that drug effects could be attributed to perseverative choice of the lever preferred at the beginning of the session. Propranolol increased choice of the large reward when tested with ascending delays. Prazosin and guanfacine had no effect on reward choice.

conclusionsThe stress-like effects of yohimbine administration may impair decision making by causing inflexible, perseverative behavior.

Indexed as

RewardAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantDecision MakingDelay DiscountingGuanfacineMalePrazosinPropranololRatsAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsGuanfacinePrazosinPropranololYohimbine

Identifiers

PMID24647923
PMCPMC4345043
OpenAlexW2076872360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.