Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24646912›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Current progress in bioactive ceramic scaffolds for bone repair and regeneration.

Chengde Gao, Youwen Deng, Pei Feng, Zhongzheng Mao, Pengjian Li, Bo Yang, Junjie Deng, Yiyuan Cao, Cijun Shuai, Shuping Peng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03407560 (Use of the Bone Substitute SintLife® in Vertebral Arthrodesis Procedures. A Pilot Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03407560 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Use of the Bone Substitute SintLife® in Vertebral Arthrodesis Procedures. A Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2017 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsSpinal FusionArmsSintLife
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Exploring bone-tumor interactions through 3DJournal of bone oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chengde GaoState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. gaochengde@gmail.com.
Youwen DengDepartment of Spine Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China. drywdeng@163.com.
Pei FengState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. fengpei@csu.edu.cn.
Zhongzheng MaoState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. maozhongzheng@gmail.com.
Pengjian LiState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. pengjianli@csu.edu.cn.
Bo YangState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. docbo309@csu.edu.cn.
Junjie DengState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. dengjunjiejj@163.com.
Yiyuan CaoState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. csu_caoyiyuan@hotmail.com.
Cijun ShuaiState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. shuai@csu.edu.cn.
Shuping PengCancer Research Institute, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China. shuping@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioactive ceramics have received great attention in the past decades owing to their success in stimulating cell proliferation, differentiation and bone tissue regeneration. They can react and form chemical bonds with cells and tissues in human body. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the application of bioactive ceramics for bone repair and regeneration. The review systematically summarizes the types and characters of bioactive ceramics, the fabrication methods for nanostructure and hierarchically porous structure, typical toughness methods for ceramic scaffold and corresponding mechanisms such as fiber toughness, whisker toughness and particle toughness. Moreover, greater insights into the mechanisms of interaction between ceramics and cells are provided, as well as the development of ceramic-based composite materials. The development and challenges of bioactive ceramics are also discussed from the perspective of bone repair and regeneration.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone RegenerationCell DifferentiationCeramicsHumansNanostructuresPorosityTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID24646912
PMCPMC3975421
OpenAlexW2047886959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.