ArticleJournal of human genetics2014
Signature of backward replication slippage at the copy number variation junction.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copy number abnormalities such as deletions and duplications give rise to a variety of medical problems and also manifest innocuous genomic variations. Aberrant DNA replication is suggested as the mechanism underlying de novo copy number abnormalities, but the precise details have remained unknown. In our present study, we analyzed the del(2)(q13q14.2) chromosomal junction site observed in a woman with a recurrent pregnancy loss. Microarray analyses allowed us to precisely demarcate a 2.8 Mb deletion in this case, which does not appear in the database of human genomic variations. This deletion includes only one brain-specific gene that could not be related to the reproduction failure of the patient. At the junction of the deletion, we found that 11-13-nucleotide sequence, originally located at the proximal breakpoint region, was repeated four times with a single-nucleotide microhomology at the joint between each repeat. The proximal region and the distal region was finally joined with six-nucleotide microhomology. The structure of the junction is consistent with backward replication slippage proposed previously. Our data lend support to the notion that a common DNA replication-mediated pathway generates copy number variation in the human genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24646726What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.