Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24646669›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2014

Microglial phagocytosis of live neurons.

Guy C Brown, Jonas J Neher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 522 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
522citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
35.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

522 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 853 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Immune-mediated excitotoxicity in brain disorders.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

462 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guy C BrownUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Biochemistry, Hopkins Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK.
Jonas J NeherDepartment of Cellular Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010593/1Wellcome Trust RG50995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia, the brain's professional phagocytes, can remove dead and dying neurons as well as synapses and the processes of live neurons. However, we and others have recently shown that microglia can also execute neuronal death by phagocytosing stressed-but-viable neurons - a process that we have termed phagoptosis. In this Progress article, we discuss evidence suggesting that phagoptosis may contribute to neuronal loss during brain development, inflammation, ischaemia and neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DeathHumansMicrogliaNeuronsPhagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID24646669
OpenAlexW2027467386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.