Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24646549›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2014

Patients' perspectives of care and surgical outcomes in Michigan: an analysis using the CAHPS hospital survey.

Kyle H Sheetz, Seth A Waits, Micah E Girotti, Darrell A Campbell, Michael J Englesbe

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Patient expectations about the oncologic benefit of pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025
    Article
  3. The Association Between Online Surgeon Ratings and Patients' Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of patient experience and the quality of hospital care.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Observational
  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Quality.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Opioid requirements in primary versus revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  10. Surgical Patients' Hospital Experience Scores: Neighborhood Context Conceptual Framework.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Combining Surgical Outcomes and Patient Experiences to Evaluate Hospital Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery Quality.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle H SheetzFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Seth A Waits
Micah E Girotti
Darrell A Campbell
Michael J Englesbe

Funding

Towards Pay for Performance in Kidney TransplantationK08DK082758 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ENGLESBE, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2009 to 2013
$624k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK0827508NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK082758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the relationship between postoperative morbidity and mortality and patients' perspectives of care.

backgroundPriorities in health care quality research are shifting to place greater emphasis on patient-centered outcomes. Whether patients' perspectives of care correlate with surgical outcomes remains unclear.

designRetrospective cohort study.

methodsUsing data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative clinical registry (2008-2012), we identified 41,833 patients undergoing major elective general or vascular surgery. Our exposure variables were the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Total and Base Scores derived from the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Patient Experience of Care Domain. Using multilevel, mixed-effects logistic regression models, we adjusted hospitals' rates of morbidity and mortality for patient comorbidities and case mix. We stratified reporting of outcomes by quintiles of hospitals' Total and Base Scores.

resultsRisk-adjusted morbidity (13.6%-28.6%) varied widely across hospitals. There were no significant differences in risk-adjusted morbidity rates between hospitals with the lowest and highest HCAHPS Total Scores (24.5% vs 20.2%, P = 0.312). The HCAHPS Base Score, which quantifies sustained achievement or improvement in patients' perspectives of care, was not associated with a reduction in postoperative morbidity over the study period despite an overall decrease of 2.5% for all centers. We observed a similar relationship between HCAHPS Total and Base Scores and postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients' perspectives of care do not correlate with the incidence of morbidity and mortality after major surgery. Improving patients' perspectives and objective outcomes may require separate initiatives for surgeons in Michigan.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareRegistriesSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Services ResearchHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansIncidenceInpatientsMaleMichiganOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID24646549
PMCPMC4049268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.