Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24646513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Management of upper respiratory tract infections by different medical practices, including homeopathy, and consumption of antibiotics in primary care: the EPI3 cohort study in France 2007-2008.

Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda, Bernard Bégaud, Michel Rossignol, Bernard Avouac, France Lert, Frederic Rouillon, Jacques Bénichou, Jacques Massol, Gerard Duru, Anne-Marie Magnier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mechanistic Evidence ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Homeopathy Use in the United States and Implications for Public Health: A Review.Homeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Homeopathy Use by US Adults: Results of a National Survey.American journal of public health · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Lamiae Grimaldi-BensoudaLA-SER, Paris, France; Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases Research Group, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France.
Bernard BégaudINSERM U657, University of Bordeaux Segalen, U657, Bordeaux, France.
Michel RossignolDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; LA-SER Center for Risk Research, Montreal, Canada.
Bernard AvouacLA-SER, Paris, France.
France LertINSERM U1018, Center for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France.
Frederic RouillonSainte-Anne Hospital, University of Paris V René Descartes, Paris, France.
Jacques BénichouINSERM U657, Pharmacoepidemiology and evaluation of the impact of health products on human health, Department of Pharmacology, University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Tondu Hospital - Case 41, Bordeaux, France; Department of Biostatistics, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Jacques MassolFaculty of Medicine, University of Franche Comté, Besançon, France.
Gerard DuruCyklad Group, Rillieux la Pape, France.
Anne-Marie MagnierFaculty of Medicine, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Lucien AbenhaimDepartment of Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; LA-SER Europe Limited, London, United Kingdom.
Didier GuillemotPasteur Institute, Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris-Ile de France Ouest, Guyancourt, Paris, France.
Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FRCentre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Ouest · FRMcGill University · CASorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de franche-comté · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) varies substantially in primary care.

objectivesTo describe and compare antibiotic and antipyretic/anti-inflammatory drugs use, URTI symptoms' resolution and occurrence of potentially-associated infections in patients seeking care from general practitioners (GPs) who exclusively prescribe conventional medications (GP-CM), regularly prescribe homeopathy within a mixed practice (GP-Mx), or are certified homeopathic GPs (GP-Ho).

methodThe EPI3 survey was a nationwide population-based study of a representative sample of 825 GPs and their patients in France (2007-2008). GP recruitment was stratified by self-declared homeopathic prescribing preferences. Adults and children with confirmed URTI were asked to participate in a standardized telephone interview at inclusion, one-, three- and twelve-month follow up. Study outcomes included medication consumption, URTI symptoms' resolution and potentially-associated infections (sinusitis or otitis media/externa) as reported by patients. Analyses included calibration to account for non-respondents and groups were compared using multivate analyses adjusting for baseline differences with a propensity score.

results518 adults and children with URTI (79.3% rhinopharyngitis) were included (36.9% response rate comparable between groups). As opposed to GP-CM patients, patients in the GP-Ho group showed significantly lower consumption of antibiotics (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.68) and antipyretic/anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.76) with similar evolution in related symptoms (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.64-2.10). An excess of potentially-associated infections (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.90-3.20) was observed in the GP-Ho group (not statistically significant). No difference was found between GP-CM and GP-Mx patients.

conclusionPatients who chose to consult GPs certified in homeopathy used less antibiotics and antipyretic/anti-inflammatory drugs for URTI than those seen by GPs prescribing conventional medications. No difference was observed in patients consulting GPs within mixed-practice. A non-statistically significant excess was estimated through modelling for associated infections in the GP-Ho group and needs to be further studied.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntipyreticsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDisease ManagementFamily PracticeFemaleFranceGeneral PractitionersHealth Care SurveysHomeopathyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntipyretics

Identifiers

PMID24646513
PMCPMC3960096
OpenAlexW2044936292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.