Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24646463›Full record

ArticleMedicine2014

Early- versus late-onset systemic sclerosis: differences in clinical presentation and outcome in 1037 patients.

Marco A Alba, César Velasco, Carmen Pilar Simeón, Vicent Fonollosa, Luis Trapiella, María Victoria Egurbide, Luis Sáez, María Jesús Castillo, José Luis Callejas, María Teresa Camps and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. New Onset Scleroderma in Elderly Males-A Case Series-Based Review of the Literature.Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marco A AlbaFrom Department of Autoimmune Diseases (MAA, GE) and Department of Epidemiology Medicine (CV), Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Catalonia; Department of Internal Medicine (CPS, VF), Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona; Department of Internal Medicine (LT), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias; Department of Internal Medicine (MVE), Hospital de Cruces, Barakaldo, Vizcaya; Department of Internal Medicine (LS), Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza; Department of Collagenosis and Pulmonary Hypertension (MJC), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla; Department of Internal Medicine (JLC), Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada; Department of Internal Medicine (MTC), Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga; Department of Internal Medicine (CT), Corporacíon Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona; Department of Internal Medicine (JJR), Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid; Department of Internal Medicine (MF), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra; Department of Internal Medicine (JAV), Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
César Velasco
Carmen Pilar Simeón
Vicent Fonollosa
Luis Trapiella
María Victoria Egurbide
Luis Sáez
María Jesús Castillo
José Luis Callejas
María Teresa Camps
Carles Tolosa
Juan José Ríos
Mayka Freire
José Antonio Vargas
Gerard Espinosa
RESCLE Registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peak age at onset of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is between 20 and 50 years, although SSc is also described in both young and elderly patients. We conducted the present study to determine if age at disease onset modulates the clinical characteristics and outcome of SSc patients. The Spanish Scleroderma Study Group recruited 1037 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.2 ± 6.8 years. Based on the mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD) of age at disease onset (45 ± 15 yr) of the whole series, patients were classified into 3 groups: age ≤ 30 years (early onset), age between 31 and 59 years (standard onset), and age ≥ 60 years (late onset). We compared initial and cumulative manifestations, immunologic features, and death rates. The early-onset group included 195 patients; standard-onset group, 651; and late-onset, 191 patients. The early-onset group had a higher prevalence of esophageal involvement (72% in early-onset compared with 67% in standard-onset and 56% in late-onset; p = 0.004), and myositis (11%, 7.2%, and 2.9%, respectively; p = 0.009), but a lower prevalence of centromere antibodies (33%, 46%, and 47%, respectively; p = 0.007). In contrast, late-onset SSc was characterized by a lower prevalence of digital ulcers (54%, 41%, and 34%, respectively; p < 0.001) but higher rates of heart conduction system abnormalities (9%, 13%, and 21%, respectively; p = 0.004). Pulmonary hypertension was found in 25% of elderly patients and in 12% of the youngest patients (p = 0.010). After correction for the population effects of age and sex, standardized mortality ratio was shown to be higher in younger patients. The results of the present study confirm that age at disease onset is associated with differences in clinical presentation and outcome in SSc patients.

Indexed as

AdultAge of OnsetFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsScleroderma, SystemicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24646463
PMCPMC4616306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.