Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24646362›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2015

Effects of a green tea extract, Polyphenon E, on systemic biomarkers of growth factor signalling in women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

K D Crew, K A Ho, P Brown, H Greenlee, T B Bevers, B Arun, N Sneige, C Hudis, H L McArthur, J Chang and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

K D CrewHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
K A HoHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
P BrownUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
H GreenleeHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
T B BeversUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
B ArunUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
N SneigeUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
C HudisMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
H L McArthurMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J ChangThe Methodist Hospital Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
M RimawiDan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
T L CornelisonDivison of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J CardelliLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.
R M SantellaHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
A WangHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
S M LippmanUniversity of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
D L HershmanHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USMethodist Hospital · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
PHASE I and II CLINICAL TRIALS OF CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS-261035159-261035159N01CN035159 · CN · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M D ANDER · PI LIPPMAN, SCOTT M. · 2004 to 2006
–
NCI NIH HHS N01 CN035159NCI NIH HHS N01-CN-35159NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIEHS NIH HHS ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational and experimental data support a potential breast cancer chemopreventive effect of green tea.

methodsWe conducted an ancillary study using archived blood/urine from a phase IB randomised, placebo-controlled dose escalation trial of an oral green tea extract, Polyphenon E (Poly E), in breast cancer patients. Using an adaptive trial design, women with stage I-III breast cancer who completed adjuvant treatment were randomised to Poly E 400 mg (n = 16), 600 mg (n = 11) and 800 mg (n = 3) twice daily or matching placebo (n = 10) for 6 months. Blood and urine collection occurred at baseline, and at 2, 4 and 6 months. Biological endpoints included growth factor [serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)], lipid (serum cholesterol, triglycerides), oxidative damage and inflammatory biomarkers.

resultsFrom July 2007-August 2009, 40 women were enrolled and 34 (26 Poly E, eight placebo) were evaluable for biomarker endpoints. At 2 months, the Poly E group (all dose levels combined) compared to placebo had a significant decrease in mean serum HGF levels (-12.7% versus +6.3%, P = 0.04). This trend persisted at 4 and 6 months but was no longer statistically significant. For the Poly E group, serum VEGF decreased by 11.5% at 2 months (P = 0.02) and 13.9% at 4 months (P = 0.05) but did not differ compared to placebo. At 2 months, there was a trend toward a decrease in serum cholesterol with Poly E (P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed for other biomarkers.

conclusionsOur findings suggest potential mechanistic actions of tea polyphenols in growth factor signalling, angiogenesis and lipid metabolism.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCatechinCholesterolFemaleHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiddle AgedPlacebosPlant ExtractsRisk FactorsSignal TransductionTeaBiomarkersCatechinCholesterolHepatocyte Growth FactorIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPlacebosPlant Extractspolyphenon ETeaTriglyceridesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Abreast cancerchemopreventiontea polyphenols

Identifiers

PMID24646362
PMCPMC4205214
OpenAlexW2157599313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.