Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2014
Clinical Trials Express: fracture risk reduction with denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis: denosumab fracture intervention randomized placebo controlled trial (DIRECT).
Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00680953 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Japanese Osteoporotic Subjects With Prevalent Fragility Vertebral Fracture), which is not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Japanese Osteoporotic Subjects With Prevalent Fragility Vertebral Fracture(s)
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Denosumab and Alendronate in Improving Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Patients and High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of antiresorptive and anabolic therapies for male osteoporosis: an updated Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of anti-osteoporosis medication on refracture prevention following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Pooled it
- Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, denosumab, teriparatide, oral bisphosphonates, and intravenous bisphosphonates in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of denosumab, risedronate, alendronate and teriparatide to treat male osteoporosis: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates and denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in osteoporosis not previously treated with bisphosphonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Pooled it
- Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacological treatments in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of anti-osteoporosis treatment for men with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2023Pooled it
- Microgravity-Related Changes in Bone Density and Treatment Options: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Safety of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the older adults with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Archives of osteoporosis · 2022Pooled it
- Denosumab is not associated with risk of malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021Pooled it
- Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of medications on prevention of secondary osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, non-vertebral fracture, and discontinuation due to adverse events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of denosumab compared to bisphosphonates in improving bone strength in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review.Singapore medical journal · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Pooled it
- Does Routine Anti-Osteoporosis Medication Lower the Risk of Fractures in Male Subjects? An Updated Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Adjudication of osteonecrosis of the jaw in phase III randomized controlled trials of denosumab: a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Osteoporosis Treatment Efficacy for Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017Pooled it
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextDenosumab 60 mg sc injection every 6 months for 36 months was well tolerated and effective in reducing the incidence of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fracture in predominantly Caucasian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
objectiveThe objective of this phase 3 fracture study was to examine the antifracture efficacy and safety of denosumab 60 mg in Japanese women and men with osteoporosis compared with placebo. DESIGN AND
settingA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label active comparator as a referential arm was conducted. PATIENTS: Subjects were 1262 Japanese patients with osteoporosis aged 50 years or older, who had one to four prevalent vertebral fractures.
interventionSubjects were randomly assigned to receive denosumab 60 mg sc every 6 months (n = 500), placebo for denosumab (n = 511), or oral alendronate 35 mg weekly (n = 251). All subjects received daily supplements of calcium and vitamin D.
main outcome measureThe primary endpoint was the 24-month incidence of new or worsening vertebral fracture for denosumab vs placebo.
resultsDenosumab significantly reduced the risk of new or worsening vertebral fracture by 65.7%, with incidences of 3.6% in denosumab and 10.3% in placebo at 24 months (hazard ratio 0.343; 95% confidence interval 0.194-0.606, P = .0001). No apparent difference in adverse events was found between denosumab and placebo during the first 24 months of the study.
conclusionThese results provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of denosumab 60 mg sc every 6 months in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.