Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24644538›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephropathology2014

Transplantation tolerance; myth or reality?

Aruna Vanikar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephropathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aruna VanikarG.R. Doshi and K.M. Mehta Institute of Kidney Diseases & Research Centre and Dr. H.L. Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education: Transplantation is now a well-accepted therapy for end organ failure. However the recipients are required to take life-long immunosuppression to prevent rejection. This leads to immunosuppression associated morbidity in the form of viral/ fungal/ bacterial infections in addition to causing financial burden on the system. Over a long run these patients are at high risk to develop malignancies.In spite of all these efforts, the graft is lost over 7-10 years to chronic graftattrition/ rejection. The only answer to this problem is "Transplant tolerance" which means stable allograft function while maintaining third party immuneresponse intact in absence of rejections on no immunosuppression. Since last 60 years transplanters across the globe are in search of this "Mackenna's gold". The following editorial discusses how far have we progressed in our search for the promised land of "Transplant Tolerance."

Indexed as

End organ failureKidney transplantationRegulatory-T cellsStem cellsToleranceTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID24644538
PMCPMC3956902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.