ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2014
New insights from major prospective cohort studies with cardiac nuclear imaging.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For more than two decades, radionuclide imaging has prevailed as a cornerstone in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiac disease. From this experience, large cohort studies have emerged that demonstrate the prognostic value of cardiac radionuclide imaging in a variety of patient groups and conditions. Myocardial perfusion imaging has accrued the most robust evidence for accurate and independent risk stratification over traditional clinical variables. In a variety of patient populations, the presence of myocardial ischemia is a strong predictor of cardiac events on follow-up. In patients with heart failure, smaller observations have similarly established the prognostic value of viability imaging and imaging of cardiac sympathetic activity. The present review provides a summary of recent cohort studies with radionuclide imaging and a critical appraisal of their clinical implications. Its purpose is to put the available evidence into a clinical context, analyze its potential impact on patient management and identify gaps in knowledge and unanswered questions to be addressed in future randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.