ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2014
Molecular- and organelle-based predictive paradigm underlying recovery by left ventricular assist device support.
Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of human plasma proteome dynamics using deuterium oxide.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2014Trial
- Animal Models for Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Research Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Insights and perspectives into clinical biomarker discovery in pediatric heart failure and congenital heart disease-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Review
- Mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the tip of the iceberg.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Similarities and Differences Between HFmrEF and HFpEF.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Analysis of fibrosis in control or pressure overloaded rat hearts after mechanical unloading by heterotopic heart transplantation.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Hold or fold--proteins in advanced heart failure and myocardial recovery.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.