Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24643740›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2014

From pluripotency to forebrain patterning: an in vitro journey astride embryonic stem cells.

Giuseppe Lupo, Michele Bertacchi, Nicoletta Carucci, Gabriella Augusti-Tocco, Stefano Biagioni, Federico Cremisi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Signatures of the Aging Brain: Finding the Links Between Genes and Phenotypes.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptional response ofRoyal Society open science · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe LupoDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "C. Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy, giuseppe.lupo@uniroma1.it.
Michele Bertacchi
Nicoletta Carucci
Gabriella Augusti-Tocco
Stefano Biagioni
Federico Cremisi
Sapienza University of Rome · ITScuola Normale Superiore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have been used extensively as in vitro models of neural development and disease, with special efforts towards their conversion into forebrain progenitors and neurons. The forebrain is the most complex brain region, giving rise to several fundamental structures, such as the cerebral cortex, the hypothalamus, and the retina. Due to the multiplicity of signaling pathways playing different roles at distinct times of embryonic development, the specification and patterning of forebrain has been difficult to study in vivo. Research performed on ESCs in vitro has provided a large body of evidence to complement work in model organisms, but these studies have often been focused more on cell type production than on cell fate regulation. In this review, we systematically reassess the current literature in the field of forebrain development in mouse and human ESCs with a focus on the molecular mechanisms of early cell fate decisions, taking into consideration the specific culture conditions, exogenous and endogenous molecular cues as described in the original studies. The resulting model of early forebrain induction and patterning provides a useful framework for further studies aimed at reconstructing forebrain development in vitro for basic research or therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansNeurogenesisProsencephalonSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID24643740
PMCPMC4098049
OpenAlexW1994410465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.