Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24643663›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2014

Research ethics policies and practices in health research institutions in sub-Saharan African countries: results of a questionnaire-based survey.

Chris Zielinski, Derege Kebede, Peter Ebongue Mbondji, Issa Sanou, Wenceslas Kouvividila, Paul-Samson Lusamba-Dikassa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Investing in health systems for universal health coverage in Africa.BMC international health and human rights · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris ZielinskiWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo chris@chriszielinski.com.
Derege KebedeWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Peter Ebongue MbondjiWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Issa SanouWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Wenceslas KouvividilaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Paul-Samson Lusamba-DikassaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the state of research ethics policies and practices in health research institutions in sub-Saharan African countries.

designA structured questionnaire was used to solicit information on research ethics from health research institutions.

settingForty-two sub-Saharan African countries.

participantsKey informants from the health research institutions.

main outcome measuresExistence of institutional ethics review policies and mechanisms.

resultsAbout half (51%) of respondent institutions reported having policies on research ethics and 58% had written policies requiring that researchers obtain informed consent of research participants. About one-third of respondent institutions (34%) had established ethics review committees, 42% required that studies went through ethics review committees and 46% had linkages with national or regional ethics organisations. Regarding operating procedures for ethics review committees, 53% had adopted standard operating procedures. Less than one-quarter of respondent institutions reported having policies in place to monitor ongoing research. Of the institutions that monitored ongoing research, 34% did an annual ethical review and 74% required a periodic written report. Only 36% provided any type of ethics training for staff, including those conducting health research and those who were not members of the ethics review committee.

conclusionsThere are substantial gaps in the capacity of health research institutions in the WHO African Region to undertake ethical review of studies before, during and after studies conducted. There is a need to strengthen such capacity in order to ensure the wellbeing of individuals enrolled in studies and that of communities that host these studies.

Indexed as

Africabiomedical researchethics

Identifiers

PMID24643663
PMCPMC4109349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.