Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24643406›Full record

Trial reportStroke2014

Translational neurorehabilitation research in the third world: what barriers to trial participation can teach us.

Sarah M Anjos, Leonardo G Cohen, Annette Sterr, Karina N F de Andrade, Adriana B Conforto

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01333579 (Low-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation To Enhance Motor Recovery In The Subacute Phase After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01333579 phase1completednot on this map

Low-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation To Enhance Motor Recovery In The Subacute Phase After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2008 to 2012Enrolled34ConditionsStrokeArmsRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers to patient recruitment in a poststroke neurorehabilitation multicenter trial in Brazil.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Challenges in Recruitment for the Study of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke: Lessons from Deep Brain Stimulation.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M AnjosFrom the Neurology Clinical Division, Neurology Department, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil (S.M.A., K.N.F.d.A., A.B.C.); Human Cortical Physiology and Stroke Rehabilitation Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.G.C.); School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom (A.S.); and Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil (A.B.C.).
Leonardo G Cohen
Annette Sterr
Karina N F de Andrade
Adriana B Conforto

Funding

Modulating brain plasticity in rehabilitation of stroke and other brain lesionsZIANS003030 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI COHEN, LEONARDO GREGORIO · 2009 to 2025
$23.2M
Novel strategies for stroke rehabilitation (planning grant)D71TW009132 · FIC · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI CONFORTO, ADRIANA B · 2011 to 2012
$58k
FIC NIH HHS D71 TW009132FIC NIH HHS D71TW009132-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMost stroke rehabilitation studies have been performed in high-income countries. The aim of this study was to identify the main barriers for patient inclusion in a research protocol performed in Brazil.

methodsWe evaluated reasons for exclusion of patients in a pilot, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial of stroke rehabilitation. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

resultsOnly 5.6% of 571 screened patients were included. Recurrent stroke was responsible for exclusion of 45.4% of potentially eligible patients.

conclusionsRecurrent stroke represented a big barrier to enroll patients in the protocol. External validity of rehabilitation trials will benefit from definition of study criteria according to regional characteristics of patients, including rates of recurrent stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01333579.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionStroke RehabilitationAgedBrazilClinical Trials as TopicDeveloping CountriesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRecurrenceTranslational Research, Biomedicalrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID24643406
PMCPMC4045412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.