Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24643196›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Prolonged calcitonin receptor signaling by salmon, but not human calcitonin, reveals ligand bias.

Kim Vietz Andreassen, Sara Toftegaard Hjuler, Sebastian G Furness, Patrick M Sexton, Arthur Christopoulos, Olivier Nosjean, Morten Asser Karsdal, Kim Henriksen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prolonged signaling of backbone-modified glucagon-like peptide-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kim Vietz AndreassenNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Sara Toftegaard HjulerNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Sebastian G FurnessDrug Discovery Biology and Department of Pharmacology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick M SextonDrug Discovery Biology and Department of Pharmacology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Arthur ChristopoulosDrug Discovery Biology and Department of Pharmacology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Olivier NosjeanInstitut de Recherches Servier, Croissy-sur-Seine, France.
Morten Asser KarsdalNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Kim HenriksenNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Nordic Bioscience (Denmark) · DKMonash University · AUServier (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmon calcitonin (sCT) and human calcitonin (hCT) are pharmacologically distinct. However, the reason for the differences is unclear. Here we analyze the differences between sCT and hCT on the human calcitonin receptor (CT(a)R) with respect to activation of cAMP signaling, β-arrestin recruitment, ligand binding kinetics and internalization. The study was conducted using mammalian cell lines heterologously expressing the human CT(a) receptor. CT(a)R downstream signaling was investigated with dose response profiles for cAMP production and β-arrestin recruitment for sCT and hCT during short term (<2 hours) and prolonged (up to 72 hours) stimulation. CT(a)R kinetics and internalization was investigated with radio-labeled sCT and hCT ligands on cultured cells and isolated membrane preparations from the same cell line. We found that sCT and hCT are equipotent during short-term stimulations with differences manifesting themselves only during long-term stimulation with sCT inducing a prolonged activation up to 72 hours, while hCT loses activity markedly earlier. The prolonged sCT stimulation of both cAMP accumulation and β-arrestin recruitment was attenuated, but not abrogated by acid wash, suggesting a role for sCT activated internalized receptors. We have demonstrated a novel phenomenon, namely that two distinct CT(a)R downstream signaling activation patterns are activated by two related ligands, thereby highlighting qualitatively different signaling responses in vitro that could have implications for sCT use in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrestinsbeta-ArrestinsCalcitoninCell LineCyclic AMPGene Expression RegulationHumansLigandsProtein TransportReceptors, CalcitoninSalmonSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsTransgenesArrestinsbeta-ArrestinsCalcitoninCyclic AMPLigandsReceptors, Calcitoninsalmon calcitonin

Identifiers

PMID24643196
PMCPMC3958426
OpenAlexW1986267285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.