Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24642861›Full record

ArticleGenome research2014

Cnidarian microRNAs frequently regulate targets by cleavage.

Yehu Moran, David Fredman, Daniela Praher, Xin Z Li, Liang Meng Wee, Fabian Rentzsch, Phillip D Zamore, Ulrich Technau, Hervé Seitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Small RNAs in Cnidaria: A review.Evolutionary applications · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Genome of the sea anemoneFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Yehu MoranDepartment for Molecular Evolution and Development, Center for Organismal Systems Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
David Fredman
Daniela Praher
Xin Z Li
Liang Meng Wee
Fabian Rentzsch
Phillip D Zamore
Ulrich Technau
Hervé Seitz
University of Vienna · ATCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

MORPHINE AND ANALOGUES EFFECTS ON CELL METABOLISMR01DA000017 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SIMON, ERIC J · 1985 to 2007
$2.0M
NEW PSYCHOMETRIC METHODS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCHK05DA000017 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BENTLER, PETER M · 1986 to 2012
$1.3M
Workshop on Techniques in Modeling Human Cancer in MiceR25CA172010 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI THREADGILL, DAVID W. · 2014 to 2024
$782k
Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22618NCI NIH HHS R25 CA172010NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000017NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA000017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bilaterians, which comprise most of extant animals, microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate the majority of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) via base-pairing of a short sequence (the miRNA "seed") to the target, subsequently promoting translational inhibition and transcript instability. In plants, many miRNAs guide endonucleolytic cleavage of highly complementary targets. Because little is known about miRNA function in nonbilaterian animals, we investigated the repertoire and biological activity of miRNAs in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, a representative of Cnidaria, the sister phylum of Bilateria. Our work uncovers scores of novel miRNAs in Nematostella, increasing the total miRNA gene count to 87. Yet only a handful are conserved in corals and hydras, suggesting that microRNA gene turnover in Cnidaria greatly exceeds that of other metazoan groups. We further show that Nematostella miRNAs frequently direct the cleavage of their mRNA targets via nearly perfect complementarity. This mode of action resembles that of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and plant miRNAs. It appears to be common in Cnidaria, as several of the miRNA target sites are conserved among distantly related anemone species, and we also detected miRNA-directed cleavage in Hydra. Unlike in bilaterians, Nematostella miRNAs are commonly coexpressed with their target transcripts. In light of these findings, we propose that post-transcriptional regulation by miRNAs functions differently in Cnidaria and Bilateria. The similar, siRNA-like mode of action of miRNAs in Cnidaria and plants suggests that this may be an ancestral state.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationAnimalsConserved SequenceMicroRNAsNucleic Acid ConformationPlantsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingSea AnemonesMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID24642861
PMCPMC3975064
OpenAlexW2148509233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.