Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24642838›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Detecting overlapping protein complexes by rough-fuzzy clustering in protein-protein interaction networks.

Hao Wu, Lin Gao, Jihua Dong, Xiaofei Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review of Drug Repositioning Approaches and Resources.International journal of biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Machine learning in postgenomic biology and personalized medicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Data mining and knowledge discovery
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao WuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Lin GaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jihua DongForeign Language Department, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaofei YangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xidian University · CNNorthwest A&F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel rough-fuzzy clustering (RFC) method to detect overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. RFC focuses on fuzzy relation model rather than graph model by integrating fuzzy sets and rough sets, employs the upper and lower approximations of rough sets to deal with overlapping complexes, and calculates the number of complexes automatically. Fuzzy relation between proteins is established and then transformed into fuzzy equivalence relation. Non-overlapping complexes correspond to equivalence classes satisfying certain equivalence relation. To obtain overlapping complexes, we calculate the similarity between one protein and each complex, and then determine whether the protein belongs to one or multiple complexes by computing the ratio of each similarity to maximum similarity. To validate RFC quantitatively, we test it in Gavin, Collins, Krogan and BioGRID datasets. Experiment results show that there is a good correspondence to reference complexes in MIPS and SGD databases. Then we compare RFC with several previous methods, including ClusterONE, CMC, MCL, GCE, OSLOM and CFinder. Results show the precision, sensitivity and separation are 32.4%, 42.9% and 81.9% higher than mean of the five methods in four weighted networks, and are 0.5%, 11.2% and 66.1% higher than mean of the six methods in five unweighted networks. Our method RFC works well for protein complexes detection and provides a new insight of network division, and it can also be applied to identify overlapping community structure in social networks and LFR benchmark networks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisProtein Interaction MapsAnimalsDatabases, ProteinDolphinsHumansProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSocial SupportProteins

Identifiers

PMID24642838
PMCPMC3958373
OpenAlexW2034328794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.