Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24642619›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Manipulating the expression of chemokine receptors enhances delivery and activity of cytokine-induced killer cells.

Y Zou, F Li, W Hou, P Sampath, Y Zhang, S H Thorne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Y Zou1] Department of Surgey, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA [2] Institute of Clinical and Basic Medical Sciences, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (The Kunhua Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology), Kunming, China.
F LiDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
W HouDepartment of Surgey, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
P SampathDepartment of Surgey, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Y ZhangDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
S H Thorne1] Department of Surgey, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA [2] Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Leonard J. Appleman · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Enhancing Delivery and Regulating Gene Expression in Oncolytic Vaccinia VectorsR01CA140215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI THORNE, STEPHEN H · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904-21S3NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are ex vivo-expanded immune cells that express NK-cell and T-cell markers and that are routinely used in the treatment of many cancers. One key advantage of CIK cells is their ability to efficiently traffic to many solid tumours. Although likely to be mediated by chemokine receptor (CKR) expression, a thorough examination of the mechanism of tumour targeting has not been previously explored.

methodsHere, human CIK cell expansions were examined for the level, profile and kinetics of CKR expression.

resultsIt was found that CIK cells express a panel of CKRs, with considerable variation between donors. Importantly, CKR levels dropped considerably beyond 14 days in culture, being significantly reduced by day 28 (the time at which cytolytic activity peaked). As such, CIK preparations that are used clinically may not have optimal CKR expression. Several approaches were found to re-stimulate CKR cell-surface levels at these later time points. These approaches also enhanced cytolytic activity in vitro and were demonstrated to increase both in vivo tumour trafficking and anti-tumour activity in mouse models.

conclusionsSimple modifications of the CIK expansion protocol could therefore be used to significantly enhance the anti-tumour effects of this therapy.

Indexed as

Cytotoxicity, ImmunologicAnimalsCell ProliferationCytokine-Induced Killer CellsFlow CytometryHeLa CellsHumansKiller Cells, NaturalMiceNeoplasmsReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, Chemokine

Identifiers

PMID24642619
PMCPMC3992500
OpenAlexW2080665311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.