Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24642254›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2014

An internal hydrophobic helical domain of Bacillus subtilis enolase is essential but not sufficient as a non-cleavable signal for its secretion.

Chun-Kai Yang, Xiao-Zhou Zhang, Chung-Dar Lu, Phang C Tai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Moonlighting inMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  4. "Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Ser/Thr protein kinase PrkC imprints phenotypic memory inThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Protein moonlighting: what is it, and why is it important?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chun-Kai YangDepartment of Biology, and Center of Biotechnology and Drug Design, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Xiao-Zhou ZhangDepartment of Biology, and Center of Biotechnology and Drug Design, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Chung-Dar LuDepartment of Biology, and Center of Biotechnology and Drug Design, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Phang C TaiDepartment of Biology, and Center of Biotechnology and Drug Design, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States. Electronic address: biopct@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

PROTEIN TRANSLOCATION &EXPORT IN GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAR01GM034766 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TAI, PHANG C. · 1985 to 2005
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 34766NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cytoplasmic proteins without a cleavable signal peptide, including enolase, are secreted during the stationary phase in Bacillus subtilis but the molecular mechanism is not yet clear. We previously identified a highly conserved embedded membrane domain in an internal hydrophobic α-helix of enolase that plays an important role in its secretion. In this study, we examined the role of the helix in more detail for the secretion of enolase. Altering this helix by mutations showed that many mutated forms in this domain were not secreted, some of which were not stable as a soluble form in the cytoplasm. On the other hand, mutations on the flanking regions of the helix or the conserved basic residues showed no deleterious effect. Bacillus enolase with the proper hydrophobic helical domain was also exported extracellularly in Escherichia coli, indicating that the requirement of the helix for the secretion of enolase is conserved in these species. GFP fusions with enolase regions showed that the hydrophobic helix domain itself was not sufficient to serve as a functional secretion signal; a minimal length of N-terminus 140 amino acids was required to mediate the secretion of the fused reporter GFP. We conclude that the internal hydrophobic helix of enolase is essential but is not sufficient as a signal for secretion; the intact long N-terminus including the hydrophobic helix domain is required to serve as a non-cleavable signal for the secretion of Bacillus enolase.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacillus subtilisCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationPhosphopyruvate HydrataseProtein Sorting SignalsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryPhosphopyruvate HydrataseProtein Sorting SignalsEnolaseHydrophobic domainSecretion

Identifiers

PMID24642254
PMCPMC4036616
OpenAlexW1992070126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.