Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24642105›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association2014

New England journal of medicine article evaluating the usefulness of meniscectomy is flawed.

Neal Elattrache, Christian Lattermann, Michael Hannon, Brian Cole

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress of knee meniscal repair techniques].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Arthroscopic debridement of the degenerative knee - Is there still a role?Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA meniscus consensus.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Utility of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neal ElattracheKerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Foundation and Sports Medicine Fellowship, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Christian LattermannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A.
Michael HannonKerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. Electronic address: michaelhannonmd@gmail.com.
Brian ColeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Cartilage Restoration Center at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A controversial article was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled "Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Versus Sham Surgery for a Degenerative Meniscal Tear" by Sihvonen et al. We believe that readers of this article should be careful about making sweeping generalizations regarding the study findings given several methodologic flaws inherent in the population studied. There are significant concerns regarding the generalizability of these data. The actual study sample group is exceedingly small as compared with the normal volume of meniscal surgery the authors are reported to routinely perform. The authors' definition of a sham procedure must be revisited. The authors' final conclusion that "arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is of no value" is simply not what the study found. We share the concerns that several other leading authorities have recently expressed about the societal implications of this work. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy has revolutionized the way we are able to treat symptomatic meniscal pathology. However, this procedure, like all surgical procedures, must be properly indicated to truly benefit our patients.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKnee InjuriesMenisci, TibialNew EnglandPlacebosSerial PublicationsTibial Meniscus InjuriesPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID24642105
OpenAlexW2087152884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.