Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24641868›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2014

Classifying patients for breast cancer by detection of autoantibodies against a panel of conformation-carrying antigens.

Rick L Evans, James V Pottala, Kristi A Egland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Autoantibodies in Early Detection of Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Angiopoietin-Like Proteins in Angiogenesis, Inflammation and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rick L Evans2301 East 60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD 57104. kristi.egland@sanfordhealth.org.
James V Pottala
Kristi A Egland
Sanford Research · USOmega Consult (Slovenia) · SI

Funding

The Impact of PD-1 Inhibition on Immune-Response to ChemoradiotherapyP20GM103548 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI MISKIMINS, W KEITH · 2012 to 2020
$20.8M
CENTER FOR CANCER BIOLOGY RESEARCHP20RR024219 · NCRR · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI MISKIMINS, W KEITH · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 1P20RR024219-01A2NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024219NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with breast cancer elicit an autoantibody response against cancer proteins, which reflects and amplifies the cellular changes associated with tumorigenesis. Detection of autoantibodies in plasma may provide a minimally invasive mechanism for early detection of breast cancer. To identify cancer proteins that elicit a humoral response, we generated a cDNA library enriched for breast cancer genes that encode membrane and secreted proteins, which are more likely to induce an antibody response compared with intracellular proteins. To generate conformation-carrying antigens that are efficiently recognized by patients' antibodies, a eukaryotic expression strategy was established. Plasma from 200 patients with breast cancer and 200 age-matched healthy controls were measured for autoantibody activity against 20 different antigens designed to have conformational epitopes using ELISA. A conditional logistic regression model was used to select a combination of autoantibody responses against the 20 different antigens to classify patients with breast cancer from healthy controls. The best combination included ANGPTL4, DKK1, GAL1, MUC1, GFRA1, GRN, and LRRC15; however, autoantibody responses against GFRA1, GRN, and LRRC15 were inversely correlated with breast cancer. When the autoantibody responses against the 7 antigens were added to the base model, including age, BMI, race and current smoking status, the assay had the following diagnostic capabilities: c-stat (95% CI), 0.82 (0.78-0.86); sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 76%; and positive likelihood ratio (95% CI), 3.04 (2.34-3.94). The model was calibrated across risk deciles (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.13) and performed well in specific subtypes of breast cancer including estrogen receptor positive, HER-2 positive, invasive, in situ and tumor sizes >1 cm.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma in SituAgedAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCase-Control StudiesCell LineEarly Detection of CancerEpitopesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansMiddle AgedAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorEpitopesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24641868
PMCPMC4437507
OpenAlexW2128563796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.