Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24641556›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2014

Epigenetics: relevance and implications for public health.

Laura S Rozek, Dana C Dolinoy, Maureen A Sartor, Gilbert S Omenn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. New Challenges for Anatomists in the Era of Omics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Epi-Drugs in Heart Failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura S RozekDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, and.
Dana C Dolinoy
Maureen A Sartor
Gilbert S Omenn
Center for Environmental Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AMY J SCHULZ · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Integrative epigenomic/genomic profiling and biomarker discovery in HPV+ and HPV-R01CA158286 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROZEK, LAURA, SARTOR, MAUREEN AGNES · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
In Utero Exposure to Bisphenol A: Effects on the Fetal EpigenomeR01ES017524 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLINOY, DANA · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
Project 1: Prenatal Lead Exposure, Early Childhood Growth, and Sexual MaturationP20ES018171 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PETERSON, KAREN EILEEN · 2010 to 2012
$584k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158286NCI NIH HHS R01CA158286-01NIEHS NIH HHS ES017524NIEHS NIH HHS P20 ES018171NIEHS NIH HHS P20 ES018171/RD 83480001NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved understanding of the multilayer regulation of the human genome has led to a greater appreciation of environmental, nutritional, and epigenetic risk factors for human disease. Chromatin remodeling, histone tail modifications, and DNA methylation are dynamic epigenetic changes responsive to external stimuli. Careful interpretation can provide insights for actionable public health through collaboration between population and basic scientists and through integration of multiple data sources. We review key findings in environmental epigenetics both in human population studies and in animal models, and discuss the implications of these results for risk assessment and public health protection. To ultimately succeed in identifying epigenetic mechanisms leading to complex phenotypes and disease, researchers must integrate the various animal models, human clinical approaches, and human population approaches while paying attention to life-stage sensitivity, to generate effective prescriptions for human health evaluation and disease prevention.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic StudiesPublic HealthAnimalsBiomarkersCarcinogenesisDNA-Binding ProteinsEnvironmental ExposureEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHealth BehaviorHistonesHumansInformation SystemsNutritional StatusPhenotypeBiomarkersCXXC1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID24641556
PMCPMC4480875
OpenAlexW2114888971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.