ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2014
A Canadian perspective on the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) hypertension guidelines.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Personalised Single-Pill Combination Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: An Update of a Practical Treatment Platform.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017Guideline
- Telemonitoring and Case Management for Hypertensive and Remote-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease-The Telemonitoring for Improved Kidney Outcomes Study (TIKO): A Clinical Research Protocol.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- The Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning and the JNC-8 Guidelines for Hypertension in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2017Article
- Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Compared With the Joint National Committee 8 Panelists' Recommendations.Clinical cardiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.