Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24640180›Full record

ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2013

Accessibility of health care service in Thasongyang, Tak Province, Thailand.

Tawatchai Yingtaweesak, Yoshitoku Yoshida, Pajjuban Hemhongsa, Nobuyuki Hamajima, Sonngan Chaiyakae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tawatchai Yingtaweesak
Yoshitoku Yoshida
Pajjuban Hemhongsa
Nobuyuki Hamajima
Sonngan Chaiyakae

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accessibility to health care services in Thailand is generally good, but a few areas in the country are difficult to reach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accessibility of health care services in rural and remote areas of Thailand. It was conducted in 16 remote villages within a catchment area with a primary health care post. The health care post staff interviewed 394 respondents (197 males and 197 females) using a structured questionnaire. Most respondents utilized primary health care posts (98.5%) and medical institutes. Most of the respondents were Karen, had low incomes, and were illiterate. However, they had health insurance. Most of them took more than 30 minutes to travel from home to their primary health care post (60.9%), and took more time in the rainy season than in the dry season. Moreover, it took more than 2 hours for them to travel to the nearest hospital from their residences (64.5% in the dry season and 84.5% in the rainy season). They also paid more for medical services, travelling and food on the way to the hospital. Not only primary health care posts, but also many other medical institutes provided health care services in the villages. In conclusion, based on the results of this study, primary health care posts in remote areas are necessary to ensure the residents' healthy lives. Therefore, improvement of the quality and accessibility of primary health care posts should be considered as the top priority.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedPovertyPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24640180
PMCPMC4345673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.