Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24639531›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Extinct New Zealand megafauna were not in decline before human colonization.

Morten Erik Allentoft, Rasmus Heller, Charlotte L Oskam, Eline D Lorenzen, Marie L Hale, M Thomas P Gilbert, Christopher Jacomb, Richard N Holdaway, Michael Bunce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Population structure ofRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A new chronology for the Māori settlement of Aotearoa (NZ) and the potential role of climate change in demographic developments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Ancient proteins resolve controversy over the identity ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Human evolution: a tale from ancient genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Morten Erik AllentoftCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen,1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Rasmus Heller
Charlotte L Oskam
Eline D Lorenzen
Marie L Hale
M Thomas P Gilbert
Christopher Jacomb
Richard N Holdaway
Michael Bunce

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extinction of New Zealand's moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes) followed the arrival of humans in the late 13th century and was the final event of the prehistoric Late Quaternary megafauna extinctions. Determining the state of the moa populations in the pre-extinction period is fundamental to understanding the causes of the event. We sampled 281 moa individuals and combined radiocarbon dating with ancient DNA analyses to help resolve the extinction debate and gain insights into moa biology. The samples, which were predominantly from the last 4,000 years preceding the extinction, represent four sympatric moa species excavated from five adjacent fossil deposits. We characterized the moa assemblage using mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellite markers developed specifically for moa. Although genetic diversity differed significantly among the four species, we found that the millennia preceding the extinction were characterized by a remarkable degree of genetic stability in all species, with no loss of heterozygosity and no shifts in allele frequencies over time. The extinction event itself was too rapid to be manifested in the moa gene pools. Contradicting previous claims of a decline in moa before Polynesian settlement in New Zealand, our findings indicate that the populations were large and stable before suddenly disappearing. This interpretation is supported by approximate Bayesian computation analyses. Our analyses consolidate the disappearance of moa as the most rapid, human-facilitated megafauna extinction documented to date.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalAnimalsBayes TheoremBirdsCalibrationDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationGeographyHumansMolecular Sequence DataNew ZealandTime FactorsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID24639531
PMCPMC3977255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.