Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24639490›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Selective attention in the honeybee optic lobes precedes behavioral choices.

Angelique C Paulk, Jacqueline A Stacey, Thomas W J Pearson, Gavin J Taylor, Richard J D Moore, Mandyam V Srinivasan, Bruno van Swinderen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of object motion on visual acuity in honeybees.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention in crows.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Ecological View of Selective Attention.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Visuo-Motor Feedback Modulates Neural Activities in the Medulla of the Honeybee,The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelique C PaulkQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jacqueline A Stacey
Thomas W J Pearson
Gavin J Taylor
Richard J D Moore
Mandyam V Srinivasan
Bruno van Swinderen
University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention allows animals to respond selectively to competing stimuli, enabling some stimuli to evoke a behavioral response while others are ignored. How the brain does this remains mysterious, although it is increasingly evident that even animals with the smallest brains display this capacity. For example, insects respond selectively to salient visual stimuli, but it is unknown where such selectivity occurs in the insect brain, or whether neural correlates of attention might predict the visual choices made by an insect. Here, we investigate neural correlates of visual attention in behaving honeybees (Apis mellifera). Using a closed-loop paradigm that allows tethered, walking bees to actively control visual objects in a virtual reality arena, we show that behavioral fixation increases neuronal responses to flickering, frequency-tagged stimuli. Attention-like effects were reduced in the optic lobes during replay of the same visual sequences, when bees were not able to control the visual displays. When bees were presented with competing frequency-tagged visual stimuli, selectivity in the medulla (an optic ganglion) preceded behavioral selection of a stimulus, suggesting that modulation of early visual processing centers precedes eventual behavioral choices made by these insects.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionBeesBehavior, AnimalBrainChoice BehaviorEvoked Potentials, VisualFixation, OcularHoneyOptic Lobe, NonmammalianPhotic StimulationWalkingelectrophysiologyinvertebratelocal field potentialvision

Identifiers

PMID24639490
PMCPMC3977245
OpenAlexW2033572282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.