ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2014
Species-specific differences in the medial prefrontal projections to the pons between rat and rabbit.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of juvenile social isolation on excitability of prefrontal pyramidal cells with different subcortical axonal projections.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
- Reevaluating the ability of cerebellum in associative motor learning.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Medial Prefrontal Cortex-Pontine Nuclei Projections Modulate Suboptimal Cue-Induced Associative Motor Learning.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2018Article
- Theta synchronization between medial prefrontal cortex and cerebellum is associated with adaptive performance of associative learning behavior.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Modification of persistent responses in medial prefrontal cortex during learning in trace eyeblink conditioning.Journal of neurophysiology · 2014Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of both rats and rabbits has been shown to support trace eyeblink conditioning, presumably by providing an input to the cerebellum via the pons that bridges the temporal gap between conditioning stimuli. The pons of rats and rabbits, however, shows divergence in gross anatomical organization, leaving open the question of whether the topography of prefrontal inputs to the pons is similar in rats and rabbits. To investigate this question, we injected anterograde tracer into the mPFC of rats and rabbits to visualize and map in 3D the distribution of labeled terminals in the pons. Effective mPFC injections showed labeled axons in the ipsilateral descending pyramidal tract in both species. In rats, discrete clusters of densely labeled terminals were observed primarily in the rostromedial pons. Clusters of labeled terminals were also observed contralateral to mPFC injection sites in rats, appearing as a less dense "mirror-image" of ipsilateral labeling. In rabbits, mPFC labeled corticopontine terminals were absent in the rostral pons, and instead were restricted to the intermediate pons. The densest terminal fields were typically observed in association with the ipsilateral pyramidal tract as it descended ventromedially through the rabbit pons. No contralateral terminal labeling was observed for any injections made in the rabbit mPFC. The results suggest the possibility that mPFC inputs to the pons may be integrated with different sources of cortical inputs between rats and rabbits. The resulting implications for mPFC or pons manipulations for studies of trace eyeblink in each species are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.