Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24639247›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2014

Species-specific differences in the medial prefrontal projections to the pons between rat and rabbit.

Maria V Moya, Jennifer J Siegel, Eedann D McCord, Brian E Kalmbach, Nikolai Dembrow, Daniel Johnston, Raymond A Chitwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria V MoyaCenter for Learning & Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712.
Jennifer J Siegel
Eedann D McCord
Brian E Kalmbach
Nikolai Dembrow
Daniel Johnston
Raymond A Chitwood
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

REVERSIBLE LESIONS--CEREBELLAR MECHANISMS MOTOR LEARNINGR01MH046904 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 1997 to 2016
$5.5M
Forebrain-Cerebellum Interactions in Trace ConditioningR01MH074006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2005 to 2015
$3.3M
Neuronal Mechanisms for Working Memory in Prefrontal CortexR01MH094839 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL, MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Cellular Information Processing in the HippocampusR01NS084473 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
USING CLASSICAL CONDITIONING TO STUDY THE CEREBELLUMR29MH046904 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 1992 to 1996
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH094839NIMH NIH HHS MH46904NIMH NIH HHS MH74006NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046904NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074006NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094839NINDS NIH HHS NS084473NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of both rats and rabbits has been shown to support trace eyeblink conditioning, presumably by providing an input to the cerebellum via the pons that bridges the temporal gap between conditioning stimuli. The pons of rats and rabbits, however, shows divergence in gross anatomical organization, leaving open the question of whether the topography of prefrontal inputs to the pons is similar in rats and rabbits. To investigate this question, we injected anterograde tracer into the mPFC of rats and rabbits to visualize and map in 3D the distribution of labeled terminals in the pons. Effective mPFC injections showed labeled axons in the ipsilateral descending pyramidal tract in both species. In rats, discrete clusters of densely labeled terminals were observed primarily in the rostromedial pons. Clusters of labeled terminals were also observed contralateral to mPFC injection sites in rats, appearing as a less dense "mirror-image" of ipsilateral labeling. In rabbits, mPFC labeled corticopontine terminals were absent in the rostral pons, and instead were restricted to the intermediate pons. The densest terminal fields were typically observed in association with the ipsilateral pyramidal tract as it descended ventromedially through the rabbit pons. No contralateral terminal labeling was observed for any injections made in the rabbit mPFC. The results suggest the possibility that mPFC inputs to the pons may be integrated with different sources of cortical inputs between rats and rabbits. The resulting implications for mPFC or pons manipulations for studies of trace eyeblink in each species are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsDextransEfferent PathwaysFluorescent DyesFunctional LateralityImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMicroscopy, FluorescencePonsPrefrontal CortexRabbitsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpecies SpecificityDextransFluorescent Dyesanterograde tracercorticocerebellarcorticopontinePFCpontine nuclei

Identifiers

PMID24639247
PMCPMC4107027
OpenAlexW2153162960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.