Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24639057›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gastroenterology2014

Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Kazuichi Okazaki, Shigeyuki Kawa, Terumi Kamisawa, Tetsuhide Ito, Kazuo Inui, Hiroyuki Irie, Takayoshi Nishino, Kenji Notohara, Isao Nishimori, Shigeki Tanaka and 6 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Clinical practice guidelines for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diagnostic imaging guide for autoimmune pancreatitis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kazuichi OkazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan, okazaki@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.
Shigeyuki Kawa
Terumi Kamisawa
Tetsuhide Ito
Kazuo Inui
Hiroyuki Irie
Takayoshi Nishino
Kenji Notohara
Isao Nishimori
Shigeki Tanaka
Toshimasa Nishiyama
Koichi Suda
Keiko Shiratori
Masao Tanaka
Tooru Shimosegawa
Working Committee of the Japan Pancreas Society and the Research Committee for Intractable Pancreatic Disease supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision.

methodsThree committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid.

resultsThe professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment.

conclusionAfter evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceConsensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansJapanPancreatitisPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.