Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24638044›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric practice2014

Use of mobile phones, computers and internet among clients of an inner-city community psychiatric clinic.

Michelle Colder Carras, Ramin Mojtabai, C Debra Furr-Holden, William Eaton, Bernadette A M Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Smartphone Applications for Mental Health.Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle Colder CarrasCARRAS, FURR-HOLDEN, and EATON: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; MOJTABAI and CULLEN: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Ramin Mojtabai
C Debra Furr-Holden
William Eaton
Bernadette A M Cullen

Funding

NIDA Epidemiology Training Program: Johns Hopkins UniversityT32DA007292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RENEE M. JOHNSON, Brion S Maher · 1993 to 2026
$17.7M
CHILD MH SERVICES AND SERVICE SYSTEM RESEARCHT32MH019545 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEAF, PHILIP J · 1992 to 2017
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007292NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019545NIMH NIH HHS T32MH019545-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent years have witnessed an expansion of Internet- and mobile-phone-based interventions for health promotion, yet few studies have focused on the use of technology by individuals with mental illness. This study examined the extent to which patients at an inner-city community psychiatry clinic had access to information and communications technology (ICT) and how they used those resources.

methodsPatients of an outpatient, inner-city community psychiatry program (N=189) completed a survey that included questions about demographics and ICT use which were adapted from an existing local population-based health survey (community sample, N=968). Frequencies of ICT use were assessed for the clinic sample and questions common to both the surveys completed by the clinic and community samples were compared using logistic regression.

resultsAmong clinic cases, 105 (55.6%) reported owning or using a computer, 162 (85.7%) reported owning or using a mobile phone, and 112 (59.3%) reportedf using the Internet. Among those who used mobile phones, the majority reported using them daily; 42% of those who used the Internet reported using it several times per day. Differences in frequency of Internet use between samples were not significant, but clinic participants used the Internet more intensively to email, instant message, access health information, and use social media sites.

conclusionsA majority of patients in this community psychiatry clinic sample use ICT. Greater access to and use of the Internet by those with mental illness has important implications for the feasibility and impact of technology-based interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBaltimoreCell PhoneCommunity Mental Health CentersComputersComputer SystemsFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsUrban PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24638044
PMCPMC5699472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.