Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a representative cross-sectional German population survey.

Markus Zenger, Rainer Schaefert, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis, Elmar Brähler, Winfried Häuser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patients' satisfaction on primary healthcare services in China and its associated factors during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinician Facial Expression of Emotion Corresponds with Patient Mindset.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus ZengerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rainer SchaefertDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christina van der Feltz-CornelisTranzo Department, Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Tilburg, Tilburg; Clinical Center for Body, Mind and Health, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Trimbos Instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elmar BrählerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Winfried HäuserDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) as perceived by the patient is an important concept in primary care and psychotherapy. The PDR Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) provides a brief measure of the therapeutic aspects of the PDR in primary care. We assessed the internal and external validity of the German version of the PDRQ-9 in a representative cross-sectional German population survey that included 2,275 persons aged ≥14 years who reported consulting with a primary care physician (PCP). The acceptance of the German version of this questionnaire was good. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the PRDQ-9 was unidimensional. The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) of the total score was .95. The corrected item-total correlations were ≥.94. The mean satisfaction index of persons with a probable depressive disorder was lower than that of persons without a probable depressive disorder, indicating good discriminative concurrent criterion validity. The correlation coefficient between satisfaction with PDR and satisfaction with pain therapy was r = .51 in 489 persons who reported chronic pain, indicating good convergent validity. Despite the limitation of low variance in the PDRQ-9 total scores, the results indicate that the German version of the PDRQ-9 is a brief questionnaire with good psychometric properties to assess German patients' perceived therapeutic alliance with PCPs in public health research.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24637904
PMCPMC3956823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.