Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637833›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)

Single cell correlation fractal dimension of chromatin: a framework to interpret 3D single molecule super-resolution.

Vincent Récamier, Ignacio Izeddin, Lana Bosanac, Maxime Dahan, Florence Proux, Xavier Darzacq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Binding memory of liquid molecules.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A proposed unified interphase nucleus chromosome structure: Preliminary preponderance of evidence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. A proposed unified mitotic chromosome architecture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Complexus cordisArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Imaging Transcription: Past, Present, and Future.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2015
    Review
  20. Inside single cells: quantitative analysis with advanced optics and nanomaterials.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent RécamierFunctional Imaging of Transcription; Ecole Normale Supérieur; Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS); Inserm U1024; CNRS UMR 8197; Paris, France; Paris Descartes University; Paris, France.
Ignacio IzeddinFunctional Imaging of Transcription; Ecole Normale Supérieur; Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS); Inserm U1024; CNRS UMR 8197; Paris, France.
Lana BosanacFunctional Imaging of Transcription; Ecole Normale Supérieur; Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS); Inserm U1024; CNRS UMR 8197; Paris, France; Molecular and Cellular Biology Department; University of California; Berkeley, CA USA.
Maxime DahanLaboratoire Physico-Chimie Curie; Institut Curie; CNRS UMR168; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris; Paris, France.
Florence ProuxFunctional Imaging of Transcription; Ecole Normale Supérieur; Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS); Inserm U1024; CNRS UMR 8197; Paris, France.
Xavier DarzacqFunctional Imaging of Transcription; Ecole Normale Supérieur; Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS); Inserm U1024; CNRS UMR 8197; Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin is a major nuclear component, and it is an active matter of debate to understand its different levels of spatial organization, as well as its implication in gene regulation. Measurements of nuclear chromatin compaction were recently used to understand how DNA is folded inside the nucleus and to detect cellular dysfunctions such as cancer. Super-resolution imaging opens new possibilities to measure chromatin organization in situ. Here, we performed a direct measure of chromatin compaction at the single cell level. We used histone H2B, one of the 4 core histone proteins forming the nucleosome, as a chromatin density marker. Using photoactivation localization microscopy (PALM) and adaptive optics, we measured the three-dimensional distribution of H2B with nanometric resolution. We computed the distribution of distances between every two points of the chromatin structure, namely the Ripley K(r) distribution. We found that the K(r) distribution of H2B followed a power law, leading to a precise measurement of the correlation fractal dimension of chromatin of 2.7. Moreover, using photoactivable GFP fused to H2B, we observed dynamic evolution of chromatin sub-regions compaction. As a result, the correlation fractal dimension of chromatin reported here can be interpreted as a dynamically maintained non-equilibrium state.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell NucleusChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNAFractalsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistonesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalChromatinDNAGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistonesadaptive opticschromatin organizationfractalsPALMsuper-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID24637833
PMCPMC4028358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.