Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637808›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

De novo structure prediction of globular proteins aided by sequence variation-derived contacts.

Tomasz Kosciolek, David T Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biophysics-based protein language models for protein engineering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exploratory Algorithm of a Multi-epitope-based Subunit Vaccine Candidate AgainstInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Saturation Mutagenesis of the Transmembrane Region of HokC inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Not Enough Natural Data? Sequence and Ye Shall Find.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomasz KosciolekBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David T JonesBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E023533/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096624/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of high accuracy residue-residue intra-protein contact prediction methods enabled a significant boost in the quality of de novo structure predictions. Here, we investigate the potential benefits of combining a well-established fragment-based folding algorithm--FRAGFOLD, with PSICOV, a contact prediction method which uses sparse inverse covariance estimation to identify co-varying sites in multiple sequence alignments. Using a comprehensive set of 150 diverse globular target proteins, up to 266 amino acids in length, we are able to address the effectiveness and some limitations of such approaches to globular proteins in practice. Overall we find that using fragment assembly with both statistical potentials and predicted contacts is significantly better than either statistical potentials or contacts alone. Results show up to nearly 80% of correct predictions (TM-score ≥0.5) within analysed dataset and a mean TM-score of 0.54. Unsuccessful modelling cases emerged either from conformational sampling problems, or insufficient contact prediction accuracy. Nevertheless, a strong dependency of the quality of final models on the fraction of satisfied predicted long-range contacts was observed. This not only highlights the importance of these contacts on determining the protein fold, but also (combined with other ensemble-derived qualities) provides a powerful guide as to the choice of correct models and the global quality of the selected model. A proposed quality assessment scoring function achieves 0.93 precision and 0.77 recall for the discrimination of correct folds on our dataset of decoys. These findings suggest the approach is well-suited for blind predictions on a variety of globular proteins of unknown 3D structure, provided that enough homologous sequences are available to construct a large and accurate multiple sequence alignment for the initial contact prediction step.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, ProteinAlgorithmsAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein FoldingProteinsThermodynamicsAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24637808
PMCPMC3956894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.