Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637693›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Tolerability of cefazolin after immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to nafcillin in the outpatient setting.

Kimberly G Blumenthal, Ilan Youngster, Erica S Shenoy, Aleena Banerji, Sandra B Nelson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tolerability of Cefazolin in Nafcillin-Intolerant Patients for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of a Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Associated withAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cephalosporin Allergy: Current Understanding and Future Challenges.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly G BlumenthalDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA kblumenthal1@partners.org.
Ilan YoungsterHarvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Erica S ShenoyMedical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Infection Control Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aleena BanerjiDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Sandra B NelsonHarvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Improving clinical, operational and economic outcomes related to MRSAK01AI110524 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SHENOY, ERICA SEIGUER · 2014 to 2016
$411k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI110524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to assess the safety and tolerability of cefazolin therapy among patients with methicillin-sensitive Gram-positive bacterial infections who develop non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to nafcillin. In this retrospective cohort analysis of the Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy program at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 2007 through 2013, we identified patients switched from nafcillin to cefazolin after an immune-mediated HSR. We reviewed patient demographics, details about the original HSR, and outcomes after the switch to cefazolin therapy. HSRs were classified by reaction type and likely mechanism. There were 467 patients treated with nafcillin, of which 60 (12.8%) were switched to cefazolin during their prescribed course. Of the 60 patients who transitioned to cefazolin, 17 (28.3%) were switched because of non-IgE-mediated HSRs. HSRs included maculopapular rash (n = 10), immune-mediated nephritis (n = 3), isolated eosinophilia (n = 2), immune-mediated hepatitis (n = 1), and a serum sickness-like reaction (n = 1). All but one patient (94.1%) who switched to cefazolin tolerated the drug with resolution of the HSR and completed their therapy with cefazolin. No patient experienced worsening of their rash or progressive organ dysfunction. With appropriate monitoring, therapy with cefazolin after non-IgE-mediated HSRs to nafcillin appears to be safe.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinCohort StudiesCross ReactionsDrug HypersensitivityFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMethicillinMiddle AgedNafcillinOutpatientsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinImmunologic FactorsMethicillinNafcillin

Identifiers

PMID24637693
PMCPMC4068447
OpenAlexW2034808857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.