Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637659›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Prospective molecular profiling of canine cancers provides a clinically relevant comparative model for evaluating personalized medicine (PMed) trials.

Melissa Paoloni, Craig Webb, Christina Mazcko, David Cherba, William Hendricks, Susan Lana, E J Ehrhart, Brad Charles, Heather Fehling, Leena Kumar and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Histotripsy Ablation in Preclinical Animal Models of Cancer and Spontaneous Tumors in Veterinary Patients: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Defining the Value of a Comparative Approach to Cancer Drug Development.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Precision medicine: an opportunity for a paradigm shift in veterinary medicine.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The importance of comparative oncology in translational medicine.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa PaoloniComparative Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Craig WebbVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America.
Christina MazckoComparative Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
David CherbaVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America.
William HendricksTranslational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Susan LanaColorado State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
E J EhrhartColorado State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Brad CharlesColorado State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Heather FehlingClinical Reference Laboratory, Lenexa, Kansas, United States of America.
Leena KumarClinical Reference Laboratory, Lenexa, Kansas, United States of America.
David VailUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Michael HensonUniversity of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Michael ChildressPurdue University, School of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Barbara KitchellMichigan State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Christopher KingsleyTranslational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Seungchan KimTranslational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Mark NeffVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America.
Barbara DavisTranslational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Chand KhannaComparative Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jeffrey TrentVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America; Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USColorado State University · USVan Andel Institute · USAmerican College of Clinical Pharmacy · USNational Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USMichigan United · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Canine Hereditary Cancer Consortium: From Bark to BedsideUC2CA148149 · NCI · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI DUESBERY, NICHOLAS S, NEFF, MARK W · 2009 to 2010
$4.3M
Comparative Oncology ProgramZIGBC010569 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KHANNA, CHAND · 2009 to 2014
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS UC2 CA148149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally occurring cancers in pet animals are heterogeneous and thus provide an opportunity to answer questions about these PMed strategies and optimize translation to human patients. In order to realize this opportunity, it is now necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting molecularly-guided analysis of tumors from dogs with naturally occurring cancer in a clinically relevant setting. METHODOLOGY: A proof-of-concept study was conducted by the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium (COTC) to determine if tumor collection, prospective molecular profiling, and PMed report generation within 1 week was feasible in dogs. Thirty-one dogs with cancers of varying histologies were enrolled. Twenty-four of 31 samples (77%) successfully met all predefined QA/QC criteria and were analyzed via Affymetrix gene expression profiling. A subsequent bioinformatics workflow transformed genomic data into a personalized drug report. Average turnaround from biopsy to report generation was 116 hours (4.8 days). Unsupervised clustering of canine tumor expression data clustered by cancer type, but supervised clustering of tumors based on the personalized drug report clustered by drug class rather than cancer type.

conclusionsCollection and turnaround of high quality canine tumor samples, centralized pathology, analyte generation, array hybridization, and bioinformatic analyses matching gene expression to therapeutic options is achievable in a practical clinical window (<1 week). Clustering data show robust signatures by cancer type but also showed patient-to-patient heterogeneity in drug predictions. This lends further support to the inclusion of a heterogeneous population of dogs with cancer into the preclinical modeling of personalized medicine. Future comparative oncology studies optimizing the delivery of PMed strategies may aid cancer drug development.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingPrecision MedicineAnimalsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDisease Models, AnimalDogsFemaleGenomicsHumansMaleNeoplasmsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24637659
PMCPMC3956546
OpenAlexW2042028253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.