Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637564›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Ligand substitutions between ruthenium-cymene compounds can control protein versus DNA targeting and anticancer activity.

Zenita Adhireksan, Gabriela E Davey, Pablo Campomanes, Michael Groessl, Catherine M Clavel, Haojie Yu, Alexey A Nazarov, Charmian Hui Fang Yeo, Wee Han Ang, Peter Dröge and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 296 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. DNA Noncovalent Interactions of Dinuclear ηChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Therapeutic Potential of Metal-Based and PARP Inhibitor Chemotherapy forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dichloro Ru(II)-ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Triazolyl- vs Pyridyl-FunctionalizedACS organic & inorganic Au · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Zenita Adhireksan1] Division of Structural Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore [2].
Gabriela E Davey1] Division of Structural Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore [2].
Pablo Campomanes1] Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Computational Biophysics, German Research School for Simulation Sciences, D-52425 Jülich, Germany [3].
Michael GroesslInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Waehringer Strasse 42, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Catherine M ClavelInstitut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Haojie YuDivision of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore.
Alexey A Nazarov1] Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland [2].
Charmian Hui Fang YeoDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Wee Han AngDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Peter DrögeDivision of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore.
Ursula RothlisbergerInstitut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paul J DysonInstitut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Curt A DaveyDivision of Structural Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruthenium compounds have become promising alternatives to platinum drugs by displaying specific activities against different cancers and favourable toxicity and clearance properties. Nonetheless, their molecular targeting and mechanism of action are poorly understood. Here we study two prototypical ruthenium-arene agents-the cytotoxic antiprimary tumour compound [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(ethylene-diamine)Cl]PF6 and the relatively non-cytotoxic antimetastasis compound [(η(6)-p-cymene)Ru(1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane)Cl2]-and discover that the former targets the DNA of chromatin, while the latter preferentially forms adducts on the histone proteins. Using a novel 'atom-to-cell' approach, we establish the basis for the surprisingly site-selective adduct formation behaviour and distinct cellular impact of these two chemically similar anticancer agents, which suggests that the cytotoxic effects arise largely from DNA lesions, whereas the protein adducts may be linked to the other therapeutic activities. Our study shows promise for developing new ruthenium drugs, via ligand-based modulation of DNA versus protein binding and thus cytotoxic potential, to target distinguishing epigenetic features of cancer cells.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCymenesDNAHumansKineticsLigandsMolecular StructureMonoterpenesProtein BindingProteinsRuthenium4-cymeneAntineoplastic AgentsCymenesDNALigandsMonoterpenesProteinsRuthenium

Identifiers

PMID24637564
PMCPMC3959212
OpenAlexW2040727845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.