Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637468›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2014

Synergistic anti-tumor effects of combined gemcitabine and cisplatin nanoparticles in a stroma-rich bladder carcinoma model.

Jing Zhang, Lei Miao, Shutao Guo, Yuan Zhang, Lu Zhang, Andrew Satterlee, William Y Kim, Leaf Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing ZhangDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330004, China.
Lei MiaoDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Shutao GuoDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Yuan ZhangDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Lu ZhangDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Andrew SatterleeDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
William Y KimLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Leaf HuangDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: leafh@unc.edu.

Funding

Translational Nanosystems for Improved Lung Cancer Treatment with Small MoleculesU54CA151652 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, WEILI · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
Nanoscale Metal-organic Frameworks for Imaging and Therapy of Pancreatic CancerU01CA151455 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, WENBIN, YEH, JEN JEN · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
LPD Nanoparticles in Anti-Cancer TherapyR01CA129835 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUANG, LEAF · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Interaction of cationic lipids with dendritic cellsR01CA129421 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUANG, LEAF · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Novel nanoparticles for siRNA deliveryR01CA149363 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUANG, LEAF · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA129421NCI NIH HHS CA129835NCI NIH HHS CA149363NCI NIH HHS CA151455NCI NIH HHS CA151652NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129421NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129835NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149363NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151455NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors grown in a stroma-rich mouse model resembling clinically advanced bladder carcinoma with UMUC3 and NIH 3T3 cells have high levels of fibroblasts and an accelerated tumor growth rate. We used this model to investigate the synergistic effect of combined gemcitabine monophosphate (GMP) nanoparticles and Cisplatin nanoparticles (Combo NP) on tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs). A single injection of Combo NP had synergistic anti-tumor effects while the same molar ratio of combined GMP and Cisplatin delivered as free drug (Combo Free) fell outside of the synergistic range. Combo NP nearly halted tumor growth with little evidence of general toxicity while Combo Free had only a modest inhibitory effect at 16mg/kg GMP and 1.6mg/kg Cisplatin. Combo NP increased levels of apoptosis within the tumor by approximately 1.3 folds (TUNEL analysis) and decreased α-SMA-positive fibroblast recruitment by more than 87% (immunofluorescence) after multiple injections compared with Combo Free, GMP NP or Cisplatin NP alone. The TAF-targeting capability of Combo NP was evaluated by double staining for TUNEL and α-SMA at various time points after a single injection. On day one after injection, 57% of the TUNEL-positive cells were identified as α-SMA-positive fibroblasts. By day four, tumor stroma was 85% depleted and 87% of the remaining TAFs were TUNEL-positive. Combo NP-treated tumors became 2.75 folds more permeable than those treated with Combo Free as measured by Evans Blue. We conclude that the antineoplastic effect of Combo NP works by first targeting TAFs and is more effective as an anti-tumor therapy than Combo Free, GMP NP or Cisplatin NP alone.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCisplatinDeoxycytidineDrug SynergismFemaleFibroblastsGemcitabineHumansMiceMice, NudeNanoparticlesNIH 3T3 CellsCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineBladder cancerCisplatinGemcitabineStromaTumor-associated fibroblasts

Identifiers

PMID24637468
PMCPMC4009696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.