ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2014
Imaging modalities in focal therapy: patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up.
Review in Current opinion in urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy.European radiology · 2016Trial
- Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-reader Agreement of the Prostate Imaging After Focal Ablation Scoring System.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Complications and Their Treatment.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Review
- Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019Review
- Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: is there a "middle ground" between active surveillance and definitive treatment?Asian journal of andrology · 2018Article
- Article
- The prostate cancer focal therapy.Gland surgery · 2018Review
- 3D Registration of mpMRI for Assessment of Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy.Academic radiology · 2017Article
- Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer.Clinical and translational imaging · 2017Article
- Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound for prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness: The role of normal peripheral zone time-intensity curves.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Pending Questions.Current urology reports · 2016Review
- Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2016Review
- Template guided transperineal saturation biopsy of the prostate: lessons for focal and urethra-sparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2016Article
- Role of Multiparametric MR Imaging in Malignancies of the Urogenital Tract.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2016Review
- Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.Abdominal imaging · 2015Article
- [Organ and function preservation in prostate cancer].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2014Article
- Multiparametric MRI in the PSA screening era.BioMed research international · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewFocal therapy for prostate cancer is emerging as a management option between active surveillance and radical treatments. In this article, we present two of the most important imaging modalities in focal therapy, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and ultrasonography. We review the recent advances within these two platforms. RECENT
findingsState-of-the-art imaging in all phases of focal therapy is essential for treatment safety. In patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up, different aspects of imaging are important. mpMRI is an imaging technology with high imaging resolution and contrast. This makes it an excellent technology for patient selection and treatment planning and follow-up. Ultrasound has the unique property of real-time image acquisition. This makes it an excellent technology for real-time treatment guidance. There are multiple novelties in these two platforms that have increased the accuracy considerably. Examples in ultrasound are contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, elastography, shear-wave elastography, and histoscanning. In mpMRI, these advantages consist of multiple sequences combined to one image and magnetic resonance thermometry. SUMMARY: Standardization of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound and mpMRI is of paramount importance. For targeted treatment and follow-up, a good negative predictive value of the test is important. There is much to gain from both of these developing fields and imaging accuracy of the two platforms is comparable. Standardization in conduct and interpretation, three-dimensional reconstruction, and fusion of the two platforms can make focal therapy the standard of care for prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.