Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637316›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2014

Imaging modalities in focal therapy: patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up.

Berrend G Muller, Willemien van den Bos, Peter A Pinto, Jean J de la Rosette

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Role of Multiparametric MR Imaging in Malignancies of the Urogenital Tract.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multiparametric MRI in the PSA screening era.BioMed research international · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Berrend G MulleraDepartment of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands bDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Willemien van den Bos
Peter A Pinto
Jean J de la Rosette

Funding

Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFocal therapy for prostate cancer is emerging as a management option between active surveillance and radical treatments. In this article, we present two of the most important imaging modalities in focal therapy, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and ultrasonography. We review the recent advances within these two platforms. RECENT

findingsState-of-the-art imaging in all phases of focal therapy is essential for treatment safety. In patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up, different aspects of imaging are important. mpMRI is an imaging technology with high imaging resolution and contrast. This makes it an excellent technology for patient selection and treatment planning and follow-up. Ultrasound has the unique property of real-time image acquisition. This makes it an excellent technology for real-time treatment guidance. There are multiple novelties in these two platforms that have increased the accuracy considerably. Examples in ultrasound are contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, elastography, shear-wave elastography, and histoscanning. In mpMRI, these advantages consist of multiple sequences combined to one image and magnetic resonance thermometry. SUMMARY: Standardization of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound and mpMRI is of paramount importance. For targeted treatment and follow-up, a good negative predictive value of the test is important. There is much to gain from both of these developing fields and imaging accuracy of the two platforms is comparable. Standardization in conduct and interpretation, three-dimensional reconstruction, and fusion of the two platforms can make focal therapy the standard of care for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesImage-Guided BiopsyPatient SelectionSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm GradingOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPredictive Value of TestsProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID24637316
PMCPMC4048732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.