Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637230›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2014

A single-institution phase II trial of radiation, temozolomide, erlotinib, and bevacizumab for initial treatment of glioblastoma.

Jennifer L Clarke, Annette M Molinaro, Joanna J Phillips, Nicholas A Butowski, Susan M Chang, Arie Perry, Joseph F Costello, Ashley A DeSilva, Jane E Rabbitt, Michael D Prados

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00525525 (A Phase II Study of Bevacizumab Plus Temodar and Tarceva After Radiation Therapy and Temodar in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma or Gliosarcoma Who Are Stable Following Radiation), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00525525 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Study of Bevacizumab Plus Temodar and Tarceva After Radiation Therapy and Temodar in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma or Gliosarcoma Who Are Stable Following Radiation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2007 to 2013Enrolled74ConditionsGlioblastoma, GliosarcomaArmsBevacizumab, Tarceva, Temozolomide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L Clarke
Annette M Molinaro
Joanna J Phillips
Nicholas A Butowski
Susan M Chang
Arie Perry
Joseph F Costello
Ashley A DeSilva
Jane E Rabbitt
Michael D Prados
University of California, San Francisco · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Project 4: Multi-modality Metabolic Imaging for Monitoring Molecular Sub-types of GliomaP01CA118816 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Pavithra Viswanath · 2007 to 2026
$44.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA118816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth the epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways are frequently overexpressed in glioblastoma multiforme. This study combined bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, and erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, with standard radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), with the goal of improving overall survival (OS).

methodsTreatment consisted of fractionated radiotherapy to 60 Gy, with daily TMZ at 75 mg/m²/d and erlotinib 150-200 mg/d (or 500-600 mg/d for patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs). Bevacizumab was given at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, starting ≥4 weeks after surgery. After radiotherapy, adjuvant TMZ was given at 200 mg/m²/d × 5d per 28-day cycle, with unchanged erlotinib and bevacizumab doses. Treatment continued until progression or for 12 months. Efficacy was compared against an institutional historical control. A sample of 55 patients was calculated to provide 85% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.67 for OS.

resultsFifty-nine patients were enrolled for efficacy analysis after a 15-patient safety lead-in. For the efficacy group, median age was 54 years; median KPS was 90. Gross total and subtotal resections were achieved in 33% and 53%, respectively. The most frequent related grade 3/4 adverse effects were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, weight loss, and fatigue. One patient died of disseminated aspergillosis. Median OS was 19.8 months (vs 18 mo for HC, P = .33) and median progression-free survival was 13.5 months (vs 8.6 mo for HC, P = .03).

conclusionsThe combination of bevacizumab, erlotinib, TMZ, and radiotherapy appears to be well tolerated and improved progression-free survival but did not reach the primary endpoint of improved OS.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabDacarbazineErlotinib HydrochlorideQuinazolinesTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID24637230
PMCPMC4057142
OpenAlexW2135298618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.