Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637222›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2014

Reconciling competence and transcriptional hierarchies with stochasticity in retinal lineages.

Henrik Boije, Ryan B MacDonald, William A Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ten-Eleven Translocation Enzymes Control the Rate and Mode of Retinal Progenitor Cell Division in the Developing Retina.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Simultaneous deletion ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  11. Neurogenesis and Specification of Retinal Ganglion Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. On the Generation and Regeneration of Retinal Ganglion Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henrik BoijeDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Ryan B MacDonaldDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
William A HarrisDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: wah20@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances suggest that there is a stochastic contribution to the proliferation and fate choice of retinal progenitors. How does this stochasticity fit with the progression of temporal competence and the transcriptional hierarchies that also influence cell division and cell fate in the developing retina? Where may stochasticity arise in the system and how do we make progress in this field when we may never fully explain the behavior of individual progenitor cells?

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalStochastic ProcessesAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageHumansRetina

Identifiers

PMID24637222
PMCPMC4127786
OpenAlexW2056117418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.