Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637165›Full record

ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2014

Evaluation of a biohybrid photoelectrochemical cell employing the purple bacterial reaction centre as a biosensor for herbicides.

David J K Swainsbury, Vincent M Friebe, Raoul N Frese, Michael R Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in biosensors for bacterial detection and identification.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Porous silicon pillar structures/photosynthetic reaction centre protein hybrid for bioelectronic applications.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David J K SwainsburySchool of Biochemistry, Medical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: D.Swainsbury@bristol.ac.uk.
Vincent M FriebeDivision of Physics and Astronomy, Department of Biophysics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands. Electronic address: v.m.friebe@vu.nl.
Raoul N FreseDivision of Physics and Astronomy, Department of Biophysics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.n.frese@vu.nl.
Michael R JonesSchool of Biochemistry, Medical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.r.jones@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I022570/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centre is a relatively robust and tractable membrane protein that has potential for exploitation in technological applications, including biohybrid devices for photovoltaics and biosensing. This report assessed the usefulness of the photocurrent generated by this reaction centre adhered to a small working electrode as the basis for a biosensor for classes of herbicides used extensively for the control of weeds in major agricultural crops. Photocurrent generation was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by the triazides atrazine and terbutryn, but not by nitrile or phenylurea herbicides. Measurements of the effects of these herbicides on the kinetics of charge recombination in photo-oxidised reaction centres in solution showed the same selectivity of response. Titrations of reaction centre photocurrents yielded half maximal inhibitory concentrations of 208nM and 2.1µM for terbutryn and atrazine, respectively, with limits of detection estimated at around 8nM and 50nM, respectively. Photocurrent attenuation provided a direct measure of herbicide concentration, with no need for model-dependent kinetic analysis of the signal used for detection or the use of prohibitively complex instrumentation, and prospects for the use of protein engineering to develop the sensitivity and selectivity of herbicide binding by the Rba. sphaeroides reaction centre are discussed.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrochemistryEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHerbicidesLightPhotochemistryPhotosynthetic Reaction Center Complex ProteinsRhodobacter sphaeroidesTriazinesHerbicidesPhotosynthetic Reaction Center Complex ProteinsTriazinesAtrazineBiosensorHerbicidePhotocurrentPhotovoltaicsReaction centre

Identifiers

PMID24637165
PMCPMC4009402
OpenAlexW2049975174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.